AMA Critiques Forced Labor in the US
By Hazem I. Kira
CA


This report about forced labor in the United States is issued by the American Muslim Alliance (AMA) as part of its ‘Expanding the American Muslim Agenda’ Series.

The International Labor Organization (ILO) defines forced labor as “all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty for which the said person has not offered himself [herself].”

Is it conceivable that helpless and vulnerable workers are subjected to forced labor in the United States? Unfortunately, yes. Hidden Slaves: Forced Labor in the United States, a report issued by the UC Berkeley Human Right Center (HRC), documents this finding.

“Forced labor is prevalent in five sectors of the US economy: prostitution and sex services (46 per cent), domestic services (27 per cent), agriculture (10 per cent), sweatshop/factory (5 per cent), and restaurant and hotel work (4 per cent).”

HRC estimates that the actual number of forced labor victims in the United States reaches “into the tens of thousands.” The US government has come to the assistance of only approximately 450 of these, over the past three years, the report says. Victims are said to suffer constant psychological assaults intended to keep them obedient, and they come from predominantly impoverished areas of the world.

The HRC’s data indicates forced labor operations exist in at least 90 US cities from January 1998 to December 2003. Victims were held in forced labor ranged from a few weeks to more than twenty years, with the majority of cases lasting between two and five years.

According to the findings, “forced labor operations are concentrated in the states of California, Florida, New York, and Texas—all of which are transit routes for international travelers.” Forced labor occurred in cities and states with large populations and sizable immigrant communities.

It is important to understand that victims of this nefarious activity come from “numerous ethnic and racial groups.” Chinese workers are the largest group of victims followed by Mexicans and Vietnamese, the report said. Most are brought in from 35 or more countries, and some are American citizens.
Not surprisingly, the perpetrators and victims are generally of the same nationality or ethnicity.

Forced labor persists in these sectors “because of low wages, lack of regulation and monitoring of working conditions, and a high demand for cheap labor,” the report said. Such economic conditions enable criminal networks and unprincipled employers to control workers' lives.

In 1995 an uncovered sweatshop operated by a Chinese-Thai family in El Monte, California, spurred a fervent national debate on the issue of forced labor. In the El Monte sweatshop, 72 workers, most of them women, were “held” and forced to sew garments behind a compound laced with razor wire fences.

The national discussion eventually spurred Congress to pass The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (Trafficking Act). Previous legislation, as interpreted by US courts, only prevented the use of physical force or threats and not psychological coercion or trickery to hold victims in bondage. This limitation in the application of the law was eliminated with the passage of the Trafficking Act of 2000.

The 2000 Trafficking Act embodies a strong, hands-on approach to the problem of human trafficking and forced labor. As a result hundreds of perpetrators have been arrested, and victims protected. Nonetheless, the HRC report finds that because most victims are undocumented workers or illegal aliens, “law enforcement often regards them as criminals rather than victims ensnared in an illicit trade.” Ironically, “treating forced labor victims as criminals only makes it easier for an ‘employer’ to get away with the crime because prosecutions rarely succeed without cooperative eyewitnesses.”

The Trafficking Act allows immigration relief and social services on condition of prosecutorial cooperation and thus creates the perception that survivors are primarily instruments of law enforcement rather than individuals who are, in and of themselves, deserving of protection and restoration of their human rights.
By and large, victims of forced labor are reluctant to report abuse to law enforcement personnel because they fear retribution from their employers. To overcome these obstacles, the HRC report states there is “an urgent need to train law enforcement personnel at all levels to recognize and assist trafficking victims.”

Because trafficking is generally defined as a federal crime to be handled by federal authorities, the HRC believes that the lack of coordination between federal and state law enforcement allows forced labored perpetrators to go undetected.

In a move that indicates the expansion of immigrant Muslim horizons and action agenda, the American Muslim community is beginning to work with policymakers and advocates in an effort to end the scourge of forced labor. Muslims are talking more openly on this issue and other issues of common good. The challenge is to not only raise awareness of this terrible problem but to get the relevant agencies to take the necessary measures to eradicate it. The AMA plans to gets the “AMA Youth Think Tank” involved with developing position papers and policy recommendations on this issue.

“We must remain alive to what the distinguished American Muslim thinker Dr. Hathout has been saying for years: ‘Any issue that pertains to human happiness and benefit is a Muslim issue,’ “ AMA Chair Dr. Agha Saeed said.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.