Quaid and Advani
By Pervaiz Alvi
US

Pakistan is a Muslim country with 97% of its population professing to the universal Islamic faith. Therefore there is nothing wrong with her people wanting to name their country as ‘Islamic Republic of Pakistan’. It is the will of her people, an acknowledgement of a fact, and expression of their national identity.
Pakistan is an important Muslim country with a definite role to play in the Islamic world and world politics at large. This is a reality whether Mrs. Sidhwa and her friends like it or not. In her writings she has time and again refused to accept that the world is made of nations and that there must be borders between countries in order to maintain their national sovereignty and integrity.
National boundaries between countries are not ‘false barriers created by politicians for purposes of their own’ as she puts it. Pakistan and India are two separate and independent countries with two distinct cultures. It is one thing to write novels of make believe worlds and another to come down to the realities of the real world we all live in. Considering the overall political and economic deprivation of its people, creation of Pakistan was a necessity for peace in South Asia. It was a natural result of intra-nations dynamics. It is unfortunate that India is still an enemy country of Pakistan with hostile intentions towards its neighbors. She has 75% of its armed forces concentrated on Pakistan’s borders. India has attacked and threatened to do so many times, and remains a constant threat to the very existence of Pakistan as a country.
Mrs. Sidhwa is naive and historically wrong when she says that ‘People of the Subcontinent have seldom fought wars except to defend themselves’. The history of South Asia is cluttered with wars large and small. Nations fought other nations and built empires on the top of dead bodies in the process. She also refuses to acknowledge the existence of The Islamic Civilization and refers to it as Arabian Civilization instead. Arabs were mere desert nomads with no civilization of their own to boast till the advent of Islam. The historical achievements she refers to belong to all Muslims and not just the Arabs.
What is needed today in Pakistan and the rest of the Muslim world is tolerance and respect for other religions and cultures for peace and harmony. They must grant and protect equal civil rights of the minorities within their own borders so that the minorities are not threatened and therefore do not think and consider these boundaries as ‘false barriers’.
Muslims while maintaining their Islamic identity must be fair, understanding and respectful towards non-Muslims worldwide. These are the true teachings of Islam and not the hatred and bigotries they may harbor towards others.
Mr. Jinnah, the father of the nation had respect for the civil rights of all citizens of Pakistan irrespective of their religions. In that sense he was a true secularist. Mr. Advani on the other hand is neither a ‘menacing tiger’ nor a ‘neighborly lamb’. He is a Hindu nationalist politician with Muslim blood on his hands. He is a ‘demolition man’ with no respect for the minorities, their civil rights and places of worship. No one is fooled by his media about-face. The names of Jinnah and Advani cannot appear together except while demonstrating the contrast between the two.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.