The Earth is Warming Up?
By Dr. Syed Amir
Bethesda, MD

Is the planet earth heading for a major climatic upheaval? While the answer, based on all available evidence, seems to be yes, no one knows for certain. The findings reported recently by NASA’s National Aeronautical and Space Administration Goddard Institute for Space Research point to some disturbing trends in the world climate.
The year 2005 has seen an inordinate number of natural disasters, a tsunami, hurricanes, and devastating earthquakes striking different parts of the globe. Their frequency and ferocity have intrigued and baffled many people. While earthquakes, such as the one that ravaged Northern Pakistan, and those that triggered the destructive tidal waves in South East Asia are unlikely to be related to any climatic changes, hurricanes may be a different story. The generation of Katrina, Wilma and a number of others that struck the southwestern US this year has been blamed by meteorologists on the progressively rising temperatures of the waters of the Gulf of Mexico. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the summer water temperature of the Gulf was the highest recorded during the last century. Even more significant, 2005 has been the warmest year since the climatologists started keeping record, a finding consistent with the observed pattern of rising temperatures seen in the past few years.
The increase in global temperature is small, only 1.36 degrees Fahrenheit above the average temperature measured during the thirty years from 1950 to 1980. On the face of it, this small increment seems negligible, hardly worth worrying about. However, scientist are concerned that the earth’s warming rate will accelerate with time and the cumulative effect of an increasingly warmer climate will have far reaching and profound consequences for the inhabitants of our planet. There are indications that this phenomenon is already having an effect.
In its issue of November 17, 2005, the British journal Nature published data collected by the World Health Organization that indicated that global warming had contributed to an estimated 150,000 deaths and more than 5 million cases of illness, caused by such diseases as malaria, diarrhea and malnutrition. The authors of the Nature article, speculate that the damaging effect of climatic changes will double within the next 25 years.
The irony of the situation is that the poorer countries of the world, which contribute very little to the atmospheric pollution, suffer most of the adverse consequences. According to the WHO study, the United States and China are the two premier environmental polluters, each emitting 1591 and 755 million metric tons, respectively, of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. However, the countries exposed to the most harmful effects are poorer countries of sub-Saharan African, South American Pacific Coast (Peru) and South Asia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Indonesia. The recent outbreak of dengue fever, a mosquito borne tropical illness that killed an estimated 1000 people in some countries of South Asia, is attributed to the accumulation of greenhouse gasses. In Peru in South America the warming effect, brought on by the Ocean current known as El Nino, is said to have led to a sharply increased rate of hospitalization among children. Apparently, as temperatures rise, the parasites responsible for malaria and other pathogens grow at an accelerated pace.
The global greenhouse effect, strangely, does not impact the entire surface of the earth equally or uniformly. Its influence on the northern hemisphere is disproportionately large, compared to the southern hemisphere. Normally, much of the sun’s heat and light is reflected back into space by the thick ice mass that covers the Arctic Ocean the year round, but when a significant part of it thaws and becomes water, it promotes a universal warming effect. Unlike ice, water absorbs heat rather than reflecting it. The North Pole is now retaining so much solar radiation that its huge arctic ice caps are progressively melting, and the vast northern glaciers that had remained intact for millennia are slowly retreating. It is estimated that the total area normally covered with ice at the North Pole shrunk in size last summer by 500,000 square miles; consequently the area that remained under ice is the smallest ever recorded. This major loss of ice mass is not without consequences. For Arctic mammals, such as polar bears, the climate change might spell disaster, while for many people living within the Arctic Circle who survive mainly by fishing and hunting, it might lead to a severe disruption of their ancient way of life. Much like the polar ice caps, glaciers in the mighty Himalayan Mountains are melting, and both Nepal and Tibet are being deluged with melting snows.
There is no unanimity of opinion about the causes of earth’s rising temperatures. Indeed, some climatologists believe that it is merely a manifestation of earth’s normal warming and cooling cycles which our planet periodically undergoes and over which we have little control. A majority, however, disagrees with this thesis and blames the warming trend on human activities, such as burning of fossil fuels, petroleum and natural gas, which cause excessive emission of carbon dioxide and other green-house gases. It has been estimated that since the start of the industrial revolution in late eighteenth century, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has risen by more than 30 percent.
The international community has not been entirely indifferent in the face of the growing threat from global warming. In 1997, an agreement was reached in Kyoto, Japan, now widely known as Kyoto Treaty that obliged the industrial countries of the world to reduce their emission of green house gases, mostly carbon dioxide, during the next ten years by 5.2 percent. The most recent studies published in the Journal Science by several European scientists indicate that the atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide and methane, are higher than anytime during the last 650,000 years of earth’s history. Now, 141 countries, including Russia, which together are responsible for some 55 percent of the atmospheric pollution, have ratified the treaty. Unfortunately, the United States which is responsible for the highest levels of gas emissions, has declined to do so. Some large countries, India, China and Brazil, are also not abiding by the treaty at this time.
No everyone is unhappy with the warming phenomenon. The retreating ice at the North Poles troubles the environmentalists and climatologists; however, it promises unprecedented money making opportunities for entrepreneurs in the rich countries bordering the Arctic Ocean. Prospects of exploration for huge oil and gas and mineral deposits under the ocean floor are alluring business people in America, Russia, Canada and Scandinavia countries that are already staking their claims on the various segments of the ocean. They are betting that as the ice retreats, it will become a lot cheaper and easier to explore for and mine the petroleum and gas reserves in this vast desolate land. Others are eyeing different possibilities, such as dramatically shorter sea routes via the North Pole for shipping, that could save millions of dollars in transportation costs for many industries. Whether the warming trend is driven by human activities, as seems most plausible, or is a reflection of earth’s natural cycles, the long-term consequences for mankind are likely to be profound and unpredictable.

 

 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.