By Syed Arif Hussaini

  March 11, 2005

Reflections on the Idea of Pakistan

Within days of the publication of this column, Pakistanis at home and abroad will be celebrating their national day. Fifty-eight years after the inception of their state, any question as to the validity or advisability of the idea of a homeland of their own would be offensive to a vast majority of them. No such question is raised as to the independent existence of even the tiny Maldives Islands, they would ask, why then in the case of Pakistan?
Dr. Stephen Cohen claims in his recent book on “The Idea of Pakistan” that it took him 44 years to write it. One can’t help wondering why a scholar of his caliber had to wait that long to point out that as a state Pakistan has emerged as a largely military-dominated entity that has nuclear weapons and is characterized by weak and uneven economic growth, political chaos, and sectarian violence. “Whether failure is a strong possibility. If so, would Pakistan dissolve slowly or collapse suddenly. Would it become an outlaw and a threat to the entire world? Or, would Pakistan become a normal state at peace with its neighbors and itself?”
While the US is currently putting pressure on Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions, the US media appear to be preparing ground for a similar operation on nuclear Pakistan – non-NATO ally or not. The recent Time magazine’s cover story on Dr. Qadeer Khan, and the lengthy stories on his activities appearing simultaneously in L.A. Times and Washington Post, point to the likely shape of things to come.
Against this backdrop, it appears surprising that some of our own writers have also joined the concert to cast shadow on the validity of the concept of Pakistan.
In this brief column, I can barely point out the salient feature of Pakistan’s raison d’etre.
Pakistan came into being because the Muslims considered themselves as a separate entity from the majority Hindu community – the well-known two-nation theory. Several movements were launched to promote a rapprochement between the two communities. Most forceful of these was the one started by Bhagat Kabir of the fifteenth century that posited that spiritual attainment was more important than the rituals of Islam or Hinduism. While it enraged the Hindu priests, the Muslims viewed it as subversive. So, it did not make much of a dent.
The Brahmanic caste system did not admit of the acceptance of Muslims in a class other than the lowest, the menial, and the untouchable - the ‘maleech’. Naturally this status was not acceptable to the Muslims who had ruled over India for centuries. Not surprisingly enough, when a Hindu converted to Islam, it meant his complete break from the past. He acquired a new name, a new personality, radiating confidence, grit and courage, and membership into a community adhering to the concept of brotherhood and equality of man.
This concept of the equality of man was the chief attraction in a society given to discrimination by birth.
Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism were all for the concept of equality and therefore opposed to the Brahmanic domination. But the shrewd Brahmanic elite maneuvered to absorb all of them into the Hindu fold. They failed to do that with the Muslims.
Let us now look at the problem from Hindu viewpoint.
Waves after waves of Muslim armies invaded India and invariably defeated and subjugated the opposing Hindu forces. Mahmood Ghaznavi invaded the country seventeen times. Qutbuddin Aibak established the first proper empire, the Slave Dynasty, towards the end of the twelfth century. This was perhaps the most outstanding incident in the annals of world history where meritocracy was taken to the highest extreme - one slave king handing over power to another slave, no relation at all. The Khiljis and the Lodhis followed the Slaves for two centuries and were replaced in 1526 by Babur, a Mogul chieftain of Central Asia, who founded the Mogul empire which lasted 331 years till the British took over in 1857.
Throughout these seven centuries of continuous Muslim rule over India, they comprised between 15 to 20 per cent of the total population. Although the Moguls adopted many Hindu customs, married into Hindu families and accommodated them in senior echelons of administration, there never was a true assimilation of the two communities and the development of a composite culture. The Muslims continued to be the ruling, warrior class with a compatible, congruent status in Indian society.
The Hindus, smarting under the dominant position of the Muslims, always looked for a leveler, an equalizer. They saw the opportunity approaching them as the combined struggle of both communities for independence from British rule gathered momentum. Muslim intellectuals had started suspecting the designs of the Hindu (Brahman) leaders as far back as the eighteenth century, particularly after the Battle of Plassey in 1757 marking the first defeat of Muslim army.
The idea of the two-nation theory had thus been germinating for a century or more before it was articulated by Sir Syed and his team and formally presented by Iqbal at the Allahabad session of the Muslim League in 1930.
The seeds of Hindu-Muslim discord were sown much earlier during the partition of Bengal in 1909 that effectively divided that area into two parts -one dominated by Muslims and the other by the Hindus. Hindu community’s opposition to the grant of separate representation to the Muslims strengthened their apprehensions towards the hidden Hindu agenda.
The grant of provincial autonomy and the induction of elected Congress ministries in 1937 and their clear communal bias alerted further the Muslim community. The Hindu leaders kept denying that there was any Muslim problem as they steadfastly maintained that India had but one community. The disillusionment among even the nationalist Muslims over the arrogance of the Congress leadership and the unsympathetic treatment meted out to the Muslims by Congress-led provincial governments solidified the idea of a separate homeland in the minds of the Muslims of the subcontinent.
As Victor Hugo says, there are no armies as powerful as an idea whose time has come. Pakistan resolution of March 23, 1940 was the formal manifestation of that idea. It received an impetus from Hindu opposition to it. Nationalism thrives on opposition. The stronger the opposition to it, the more coherent it grew.
Theoretically though the idea had a serious flaw. It did not cover the entire Muslim community of India. It was understood that the presence of a large Hindu minority in Pakistan would assure the protection of the Muslim minority in Hindu India. Subsequent developments have proved this wrong.
The idea had, anyway, taken firm roots. Quaid-Azam led eminently the nation in pursuit of that idea. As Stanley Wolpert, Professor of History at UCLA describes it succinctly in his biography of the Quaid: “Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly any one can be credited with creating a nation-state. Mohammad Ali Jinnah did all three.”
Even his opponents acknowledge his eminent role in the realization of the idea. But, this does not mean that Pakistan would not have come into existence had the Quaid not been there. Some one else would have emerged to lead the people in the pursuit of that idea whose time had come.
When Mahatama Gandhi, representing the Hindu community, agreed to the division of India and the creation of Pakistan, he called his acceptance “a Himalayan blunder”. A fanatic Hindu, Godse, shot him dead for that “blunder”.
It was no blunder; it was an acceptance of an unavoidable reality. Mr. Gandhi’s statement was merely to assuage the feelings of nationalist Hindus.
Let me add here that Mr. Gandhi was a great thinker, a far-sighted intellectual, with the uncanny quality of practicing what he preached for the uplift of the menial class – the Harijans (children of God). He had no compunction in doing the work of Harijans including the cleaning of lavatories. He was by any standard a great benefactor of the downtrodden. He turned the Hindu trait of non-violence into a point of strength that played a significant role in the struggle for independence.
From the perspective of a student of history of the subcontinent, Pakistan was inevitable, so was the split and creation of an independent Bangladesh. In the hysterical euphoria on the surrender of Pak Army, Mrs. Gandhi proclaimed, “Today we have thrown the two-nation theory into the Bay of Bengal”. Fact of the matter is that with the separation of Pakistan’s eastern wing, the two nations became three and the new nation, Bangladesh, could not be amalgamated into the Indian Bengal.
Within four years of liberation of Bangladesh, the architect of that state, Mujibur Rehman, was killed and the Indo-Bangladesh Alliance of 1972 went into animated suspension till it lapsed in 1992.
Many of Pakistan’s self-serving and greedy leaders, both civilian and military, have badly let down the people. Their follies do not negate the conceptual moorings of the state. Right now, the men in uniform are on a usurpation rampage. That will end as the scenario is already shifting. But, under an alien yoke, it would be darkness for centuries.
The people of Pakistan are made of excellent material. The system that is keeping them under the heel need must change. Give them freedom and education and see how they shine. Time is not far when they would emerge from under the heels of the jack-boots of the ruling elite. In the distaste for the army rule, let us not be impetuous and cut the nose to spite the face.
Naheim mayoos Iqbal apni kisht-I-veran say
Zara hum ho to yeh matti bari zarkhez hai saqi - Iqbal

Arifhussain@hotmail.com March 4, 2005

PREVIOUSLY

Desire and the Culture of Instant Gratification

March 23 - Memories & Nostalgia

Deeper Malaise of Pakistan Polity

BJP’s Debacle in the Battle for Ballots

Feudalism’s Aversion to Education

Forgetfulness -a Prank of Old Age or of Hyperfocus

The Taliban and Beyond

Meetings of World Economic Forum and Its Counterweight

BJP Fails Again to Frame Pakistan

Indo-Chinese Relations in Perspective

Taj Mahal and Indo-Pakistan Standoff

Grandma, Grandpa

'The Clash of Civilizations' : A Questionable Thesis

In the Gadgeteer's Dreamland

Emergence of MMA on Pak Political Landscape

Chechnya and Moscow's Hostage Crisis

Turkish Elections in Historical Perspective

Iraq's Oil Wealth

America: A Nation on Wheels

"Jinnah & Pakistan" - A Worthwhile Book

Afghanistan Merits More Attention

The Siren Song of Sale and Savings

In Memory of Dr. Hamidullah

Tackling Murphy at the Airport

Musings of a Superannuated Man

US Economy: Will Bush's Plan Work

Tempo of Life in America

The Genius behind the Mouse

The Media Mogul Who Manipulated Men and Events

Hearst and Disney: A Comparative Study

Nothing but the Truth

War on Iraq Imminent and Inevitable

Mahathir's Interesting Views

Portents of a New World Order

March 23 - Memories & Nostalgia

Rachel Corrie & the Spotted Owl

Lost in Cyberspace

The American Nice Guyism

Connecticut - A Nursery of Men

On a Visit to Canada after Half of Century

Some Legal Aspects of the Iraq War

Bureaucratic Antics

Rhode Island: An Oxymoron, a Paradox

The Mystique of California

Comic Operas in Islamabad & in Texas

Khyber Knights: A Fascinating Book

G-8 Summit Skirts Touchy Issues

In Memory of a Versatile Genius

Hillary Clinton's Cleverly Crafted Book

Chitranwala Katora and Chutkiyan

The Yak Shows : The Trash Talks

The Giants of Sequoia National Park

Reflections on Pakistan's Independence Day

Aziz Kay 'Sifarati Maarkay And Mujtaba Kay 'Safarnamay'

California's Political Circus

Lali Chaudhri's Provocative Short Stories

September: A Witness to Wars

America in the Quagmire of Iraq

Collapse of Another WTO Summit

A B C D: American-Born-Clear-Headed Desis

The Pangs of Waiting

Chechnya: A Ray of Hope for Peace

American Job Exodus to China

Islamabad : Its Beauty & Oddities

Welcome Proposals to Break Indo-Pak Logjam

Benazir's Case and the Corruption Scenario

Predicament of Pakistan's Polity

When Memory Starts Faltering

Terror in Turkey Unrelated to Nation's Cultural Conflict

The Siren Song of Sale and Savings

Wrinkles in US-China Relations

Wrinkles in US-China Relations

Saddam Crawls out of a Hole to Ignominy

Saddam Crawls out of a Hole to Ignominy

When Memory Starts Faltering

A Day in the Company of Mujtaba Hussain

Hyderabad Presents a Panorama of Progress and Change

Conflict over New World Economic Order

Pakistan's Nuclear Scandal

Urdu in Hyderabad Deccan

A Good Book on a Great Man

Gay Marriages in Vivacious San Francisco

The Passion of the Christ - A Well-Sculpted but Fuss-Causing Film

A Treat of Mujtaba's Wit and Humor

Predicament of Pakistan's Polity

The Murder of Sheikh Yassin: Israel's Hidden Agenda

Army Action in Pakistan's Tribal Belt

Would the NSC Buttress or Besiege Democracy?

Desire and the Culture of Instant Gratification

Swiss Court and the Benazir-Zardari Plunder Saga

Pakistan and the International Economic Forums

Why Do US Follies Keep Piling up in Iraq?

The Tamasha at Lahore Airport

Indian Elections and Subsequent Developments

Bush Flaunts His Faulty Policies on Iraq

Post Civil War America and Post-Independence Pakistan

Bureaucratic Antics

Tackling Murphy at the Airport

Asma's Fascinating Book on Islam

APPNA Qissa - 25 Years of Activities of Pak-American Doctors

Bureacratic Antics

Nightmare in Sudan

In Pursuit of Terrorists

Why Turkey's Entry into European Union Is Blocked?

Forgetfulness - A Prank of Old Age or of Hyperfocus

Kremlin's Inept Tackling of Chechen Extremists

Who Should Get My Vote In November Election?

Bush vs. Annan on Legal Status of Iraq War

Rethinking the National Security of Pakistan

The Brief Message

Desire and the Culture of Instant Gratification

Is Iran the Next Target?

Dollar vs. Euro -A Question of Hegemony

Zardari’s Release Indicative of Reconciliation?

The Siren Song of Sale and Savings

Christmastime – A Festive Occasion

Pak-China Ties Keep Growing Firmly

American Shopping Malls

Tsunami - an Asian Disaster

Dr. Cohen’s Thought-Provoking Work on Pakistan

Alice in the Freeland

Balochistan: Crisis & Conflict

Iran the Next Target, but

The Common Man

Chechnya: Chaos to Continue in the Caucasus

Global Warming and Emulators of the OstrichA

Treat of Mujtaba’s Wit and Humor


Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.