By Dr. Nayyer Ali

February 13, 2008

How Big a Problem is Global Warming?

According to the IPCC, the UN body charged with assessing climate change, there is a 90% certainty that human action is warming the planet, and that without serious changes in our energy systems, further significant warming will occur this century.  To stop this, we would need to fundamentally, and expensively, transform how all nations generate and consume energy.  The cost of such a change would be in trillions of dollars, spread over many years, and there would be a likely reduction in the speed of economic growth, making generations to come not as wealthy as they otherwise would have become.
Needless to say, the decision to address this problem should not be undertaken lightly. Unfortunately, the debate has become highly political, with scientific nuance and rational judgment often ditched in favor of extreme positions. Some on the environmental side argue that we are already on the verge of a global catastrophe that will cause all sorts of havoc with both societies and the natural world.  Some skeptics deny that any global climate change has even occurred, and suggest that the entire case for global warming is fabricated with cooked evidence.
What we do know for certain is that carbon dioxide is a gas that does trap solar radiation, and tends to raise the temperature of the Earth.  We also know that use of fossil fuels results in the massive release of carbon dioxide.  From a baseline level of 320 parts per million in 1900, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has risen to 380 ppm. According to the “business as usual” scenario that the IPCC generated, this level will rise to about 800 ppm by the end of this century.  We also know that in the 20th century, the Earth’s climate warmed by about 0.8 degree centigrade, although much of that occurred before 1940, and then the climate cooled slightly, before warming began again about 1975. But now comes the hard part.  What would the effect of that future rise in carbon dioxide be on the climate of the Earth, and what would be the real world consequences of those climate changes?
This is where the true answer is “we don’t know”. Unfortunately, proponents of immediate action have taken to claiming that we do know, that it would be a very significant amount of warming (perhaps 5 degrees centigrade), and that we need to act immediately to stop it before catastrophic changes become inevitable. Critics have raised a number of serious questions, but their complaints have not been addressed fully, for reasons that are mostly political.
There are some serious questions that need to be answered before it becomes sensible to engage in highly expensive actions that will harm both developed and developing economies.  The IPCC scenarios themselves have a couple of serious problems.  First, the total global emissions projected for the century are probably exaggerated.  This is for three reasons.  The IPCC overestimates human population growth (by about a billion people compared with the UN projections).  It also overestimates the amount of economic growth that will happen in the developing world due to a very silly error. The IPCC used market exchange rates to measure the size of poor economies in dollar terms, rather than using purchasing power equivalents.  Such an error vastly underestimates the size of Third World economies, including China and India.  As the IPCC assumes these countries will catch up with the developed world over the next hundred years, the choice of an artificially low baseline results in substantially overestimated subsequent growth.  
Finally, the IPCC business as usual scenario simply ignored the fact that some action to reduce greenhouse gases will occur, and that the rapidly falling prices of renewables like solar and wind power will gradually result in a shift to these power sources over the next 75 years for purely economic reasons.  Reasonable assumptions about all of these issues would substantially cut the long run carbon dioxide emissions projected, even without any drastic action.
Another set of issues has to do with the computer models that the IPCC is relying on to make its predictions.  How do we know that these models are in fact accurate in any way? None has ever been tested, which is the basis of any true scientific validation.  They all involve idiosyncratic tweaks and fudges to make them work.  And they are not able to model clouds and water vapor, which would be critical to any realistic model of Earth’s climate.  So if these computer programs cannot be trusted, what are we to make of their outputs, and how can we justify turning our world upside down based on them?  Each of these programs is proprietary, and the centers that have created them do not fully disclose their inner workings to allow outsiders to comment on them.  
Finally, the data of the last ten years has not been as alarmist as the IPCC projections would have one expect.  Since 2000, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration has been rising much less rapidly than the “business as usual” scenario projected, only 16 ppm instead of the expected 24 ppm.   Carbon dioxide levels are rising about 20 ppm per decade currently; at that rate levels will only reach 580 by 2100, which many scientists consider “safe”.  In addition, instead of rising by about 0.5 degrees centigrade, as the IPCC predicted, average global temperatures have been in a downtrend since 2000, with 2008 continuing that trend.  Polar sea ice is back to its long run average this winter. Critics contend that the climate models are flawed, that they all fundamentally run “hot”. This means that they overstate how much warming a given rise in carbon dioxide will generate.  If so, that would also suggest that the IPCC scenario is overcooked.  
What is the responsibility of today’s world to fix a problem that may or may not materialize a hundred years from now?  To what extent should people in 1909 have anticipated our world and sacrificed then to allow us to avoid certain assumed problems today?  Conversely, how can we justify spending resources on fixing a problem for the distant future, while not providing enough funds to fix the crushing problems, like AIDS or natural disasters or malaria, that kill people today?  This is not a call for doing nothing, but rather a suggestion that we think carefully and choose wisely before we act.  Perhaps we should create the basic framework to address the problems, such as enacting a very modest carbon tax, or creating a very loose global cap and trade system, but without taking harsh action immediately.  Boosting investment in renewables, and especially in research into clean sources of energy makes great sense.  As does investing in energy efficiency and conservation.  Finally, doing research into geo-engineering options, which could be a final safety net that could be used if in fact things turn out badly, would be good policy.


Deflating Japan

Bush’s Axis of Evil

Speaking to Non-Muslims

If Arafat Were Jinnah

The Shape of Things to Come

South Asia Expert Calls for Negotiations on Kashmir

Kashmir After the Cold War

Kashmir Quagmire: How It Started

Kashmir: Where We’ve Been

Make Way for the Euro

Will there Be a Muslim Palestine?

Careful, Careful

Our Growing Community

Pakistan’s Golden Opportunity

Musharraf’s Reform Plans

Pakistan’s Afghan Dilemma

Humanity on the Move

Strategies of America, Pakistan and Benazir

Winners and Losers

America’s Strategy Defang the Fundamentalists

The Noose Tightens

Pakistan in America

Musharraf’s Moment

A Sad Day for America, A Sad Day for Islam

Repeal the Blasphemy Law

Bush’s Stem Cell Compromise

The Depressing Stock Market

An Evening on Human Development

“Benazir” Takes Over in Indonesia

Race Riots in Britain

Global Warming or Just Hot Air?

Milosevic on Trial

Russia’s Collapse

Economic Recovery in Pakistan?

President Khatami’s Re-election

Lifting Sanctions on Pakistan

Israel’s Moral Burden

A Break in the Logjam?

The Second American Century

Pakistan’s Constitution

Dr. Lodhi in Los Angeles

Literacy: The Road Forward

Why Yusuf Can't Read

Literacy: The Glass is Half Full

Blowing Up Buddha

A Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Pakistan

Did You See the Moon?

Cornrows, Ali Khan, and Culture

Will the Children Go To Harvard?

Muslim Political Progress

Information Technology Gets A Boost

Sand and Oil

On Lieberman

Pakistan Builds A Tank

Kashmir in the Nuclear Age

Full Speed Ahead on Privatization

A Muslim France?

Too Much Food

Watching the Election Why Are We Hollywood’s Villains?

A Tyrant Falls

Taliban Victorious

The Walking Whale of Pakistan
The Joy of Air Travel?

The Amazing American Economy
Arafat and Jerusalem

Names For The Children

Population: Too Many or Too Few?

It Does Matter

Aziz Goes For Growth

The Military Government's First Budget

L'Affaire Salam

End Sanctions on Iraq

Third World Democracy

Light Weapons Trade on the Rise

Iran Reforms

Back to the Future

The Saudis and OPEC Mature

How Can We Help Pakistan Develop?

Report Card on Musharraf

IMF Vs Pakistan

A Candid Discussion on Foreign Policy Issues

A Sad Tale of Missed Opportunities

Cold War In Kashmir

Whither Afghanistan?

National Security and Literacy

Pakistan Votes

The People Win

What is an Islamist?

Selling the Crown Jewels

Still Not Government

One Year After the Taliban

Benazir's Folly

Iraq and Oil

Saddam and Iraq - I

Saddam and Iraq - 2

Muslim Democracy

Zakat and Capitalism

Zakat and Capitalism - 2

The Economy Picks Up

The American Military: Power without Limit?

Good Foreign Policy is Good Anti-Terrorism Policy

The Arrest of Khalid Shaikh Mohammad

Bush Takes a Gamble

Bush Attacks

Besieging Baghdad

Darkness in Saddam's Bunker

Piccadilly It Aint Qissa Khani Is Still Qissa Kahani

Ed Asner and Afghanistan's Progress

Bush Delivers a Roadmap

Liberation or Imperialism

The Roadmap

Economic Rebound

Musharraf in Los Angeles

Economic Growth will lead to Democracy

Trapped by Myths and Fantasies

The Surge in Karachi Stocks

Bush's Busted Budget

America's Broken Healthcare

Time to Buy Stocks?

Islam, the State, and Human Rights

30 Years after the Oil Shock

The Future of Oil Wealth

Pakistan, India and Human Development

Pakistan's Eid Present

Iraq, Democracy and Islam

The End of Saddam Hussein

Three Wins for Pakistan

The Islamabad Declaration

Kerry's Big Wins

Repeal Hudood and Blasphemy

Bush's Growing Vulnerability

What Has Aziz Done?

Bits and Pieces

The Growth of India

Chaos in Iraq

Bush Caves in to Sharon

Abuse at Abu Ghraib

Too Harsh, Musharraf

The BJP Loses

What Do the Jihadis Want?

The Pak Economy: Bigger than We Think

Is America Richer than Europe?

Prime Minister Aziz

Unbundling WAPDA

Musharraf's Uniform

Chess Game in Kashmir

Three States, Three Debates

What's Wrong with the Democrats?

Can Elections Bring Peace to Iraq?

Elections in Iraq

Can Generals Yield to Democrats?

IMF Give Pakistan an “A”

Improve Higher Education in Pakistan

A Framework for Reconciliation

Iraq’s Elections By

Privatizing Power

Bullish in Karachi

Palestinians Should Abandon Suicide Bombings

The F-16’s

Bush’s Social Security Plan

Growth and Investment

Patronage Versus Policy

Aziz, the PML, and 2007

Are We Running out of Oil?

Purchasing Power

Economic Progress

Social Progress

PTCL and the Privatization Roller-coaster

Bombing in Britain

The Ummah is Not a Tribe

Is the US Oppressing the Muslims?

Is Iraq Dissolving?

Sharon Retreats

Pakistan and Israel

The Earthquake

The Other Earthquakes

The Battle for the Supreme Court

Pakistan’s Physician Exports

Beginning of the End in Palestine

Intelligent Design and Other Religious Beliefs

Shifting Populations in South Asia

Sharon’s Stroke

Building Dams

Hamas in Charge

Free Elections in 2007

Muslim Perspectives on Zionism

Iraq Falls Apart

Big Successes in Privatization

Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

Global Warming

Dennis Ross on the Middle East

What Makes an Islamic State?

The Iraq War

Strong Growth, Falling Poverty

Buffett and His Billions

Why Peace Is Elusive in the Middle East

How Poor is Poor?

How Poor is Poor?
Pakistan’s Growth Moment

Declare a Palestinian State

The London Bomb Plot

Who Won the Lebanon War?

Iran, Israel, and the Bomb

The Pope’s Speech

Democrats Win!

The Republicans Lick Their Wounds

Finally, Some Enlightened Moderation

The Error in the War on Terror

Economic Challenges for Pakistan

Reshaping the Middle East - Part 1

Reshaping the Middle East - Part Two

The Surge to Defeat

Whither Palestinians?

Pakistan and Afghanistan

Blind to the Future?

Musharraf Goes Too Far

Letter from Lahore

Can Musharraf Escape His Own Trap?

Will Healthcare Swallow the Economy?

Israel’s Surprise Offer

The Economy Surges Again

Al Gore Should Run

Pakistan’s Arms Industry

Any Exit from Iraq?

Deal, No Deal, or Many Deals

Nawaz Comes and Goes

Will Musharraf Wriggle Through?

Can We Stop Global Warming?

Bush’s Sputtering “War on Terror” Loses Again

Mental Health at Guantanamo Bay

What a Mess!

Will Musharraf’s Errors Prove Fatal?

How About Some Good News?

Anyone but Nawaz

China, India, and Pakistan: Whose Citizens Live Best?

Electing the Next President

Benazir’s Tragedy

Pakistan Election

Democracy and Pakistan

False Hopes in Palestine

Dinner with Shaukat Aziz

How Real Were Aziz’s Reforms?

The State of Pakistan

A Real Debate on Iraq

Stop Negotiating

Severe Challenges Face Pakistan’s Economy

Mindless Obsession with Musharraf

After Musharraf, More Musharraf?

Can Obama Do It?

Pakistan’s Poverty Profile

Economic Crisis in Pakistan

Can Obama Beat McCain?

Was the Aziz Boom a Mirage?

Pakistan’s Presidency

The Failed Presidency of George W. Bush

McCain Is Not Finished

The Economic Meltdown

A Year after the Annapolis Peace Conference

The Significance of Obama’s Win

Pakistan’s Economic Challenge

New Finds in Qur’anic History

The Assault on Gaza

Is a Trillion Dollar Stimulus Really Needed?

Bush’s Economic Legacy

Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 . All Rights Reserved.