By Dr. Nayyer Ali

September 18 , 2015

14 Years after 9/11

14 years after 9/11 it’s been fascinating to watch the return of the neo-cons as their deranged thinking continues to dominate Republican foreign policy.  Rand Paul was the only Republican who was willing to confront how catastrophic that approach has been for America, but the rest of the candidates are shameless.  The revised history is now that Bush won the war and Obama squandered our victory in Iraq.  The reality is that the Iraq War was the single greatest disaster in American foreign policy history.  This harebrained policy choice, given birth in the jingoistic atmosphere after 9/11, was so wrong in so many ways, and permanently damaged American interests.  

The Iraq War was conceived by Cheney and company on the day of 9/11 itself.  They began to put into effect a goal of the neo-cons that had been floating around for years.  In the late 1990's, the neo-conservatives starting agitating without success for regime change in Iraq, and organized through a group called the Project for a New American Century.  Without a dramatic change in domestic politics, there was no way the US would go to war with Iraq.  9/11 created an atmosphere that made it possible.  Taking out the Taliban was a bit too easy, and the country was still in a mood to "hit them back" in some vague way, a mood shared by many Democrats.  But who to go after?  The problem was that the main source of funding radicals was the Saudis and other Gulf Arabs who were American allies, so there was not much point in invading them.  Bush and Cheney targeted Iraq, and justified it by first trying to somehow tie Saddam Hussein to Al-Qaeda and 9/11, which was a crock, and then claimed that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction" that had to be eliminated.  To leave Saddam in possession of those weapons created the likelihood he would one day furnish them to terrorists who would then attack the US, hence the need for a preemptive war.

Saddam persisted in being ambiguous on the issue, mainly to keep his arch-enemy, Iran, thinking he did have such weapons.  Saddam did not believe Bush would really go to war, but in the runup to the war Saddam permitted UN weapons inspectors into the country.  They found nothing, but Bush was not perturbed by that.  Instead he claimed the intelligence was completely solid, and even trotted out Colin Powell to make a fool of himself at the UN Security Council with a paper thin case.  Despite the opposition of most of the world, and the lack of UN approval, Bush decided on war.

The big lie at the heart of WMD was that Bush was lumping two things that were not really WMD with something that was, but which Iraq clearly had no ability to make.  Chemical weapons are pretty useless and cannot destroy cities, and require airpower to reliably deliver to a large target, something no terrorist would have.  Chemical weapons have been around for a hundred years, and while nasty, did not constitute a threat to the US to justify war.

Biological weapons do not exist.  Neither the US nor the Soviets ever developed a usable weapon, and anthrax spores in the mail don't count.  Biological weapons have to be easily transmitted, lethal, quick acting, unable to be treated, and not create a risk of infection to the instigator.  No such weapons exist.  The idea that some Iraqi scientists in RV's were cooking up vast batches of smallpox or some such thing is preposterous, and even if they did, it is useless as a weapon.

The only real WMD is nuclear, and Iraq had no nuclear reactor, no centrifuges, no sources of uranium, and no infrastructure needed to build a bomb.  Even if they did such sites could easily have been bombed directly anyway and did not require invasion.  In summary, there was no WMD, and any thinking person would have figured that out in two seconds.

Once the war took place, there was no real planning of how to reconstitute Iraq after the invasion.  Iraq, as most Americans have come to know, is a very complex place.  It is not like Egypt or Jordan which are much more homogeneous societies.  Iraq had a Kurdish minority which wanted nothing to do with a central government out of Baghdad, a Shia majority that looked to Iran as its natural friend, and a ruling Sunni minority that felt entitled to keep power.  To barge into that situation, depose Saddam, and turn it into an Arab Switzerland would have taken a geopolitical Houdini, which Bush certainly wasn't.  Rumsfeld thought the army would be withdrawn in a few months after the war, and no one in the White House foresaw a massive eight-year occupation that would sap the American military and budget.  The most basic planning, such as having a few battalions of military police ready to impose order in Baghdad after conquest was not done.  The result was massive looting, the destruction of all the government ministries, and a sense of chaos that just accelerated over the years.

Bush likely didn’t even know the difference between Sunni and Shia when he invaded, which he learned at a painful cost.  Overthrowing Saddam and creating democratic government meant overthrowing decades of Sunni domination and empowering the Shia, by obvious demographics.  The neo-cons thought that secular US aligned figures like Ahmed Chalabi would lead the Shias after the war, but those guys had zero street credibility.  Power flowed towards the main anti-Saddam groups that were in exile in Iran, and Nuri al-Maliki was a viciously sectarian pro-Iranian Prime Minister whose selection was signed off on by Bush.  It was a disastrous choice.  The whole concept of turning Iraq into a real democracy with balanced government, respect for human rights, and real political parties based on something other than crude sectarian desires, was a fantasy.  Even the most learned Iraq scholars would have found it an impossible challenge, and the inept inattentive Bush had no chance of success.

But the occupation was bungled massively right from the start.  The standing Iraqi army was completely disbanded on White House orders, thereby throwing the Sunni officer corps out of job and denying them pensions.  This created a group of motivated anti-American militarily trained Sunnis who formed the core of the insurgency.  Meanwhile, civilian Sunnis were also thrown out of their jobs in the government bureaucracy under the rubric of "de-Baathification".  This policy was not limited to a handful of Saddam's top lieutenants, but extended to a vast part of the civil service, throwing ordinary people out of work and creating even more enemies.  Abu Ghraib further embittered Iraqis.

The end result was a massive insurgency.  Eventually 5000 American soldiers would be killed, another thousand contractors would die, tens of thousands wounded, and more came home with PTSD and other psychiatric issues.  All these wasted and broken lives for nothing.  Add to that a financial cost that pushed three trillion dollars when all the disability payments and VA benefits for life were added in.  What a massive waste.  Three trillion dollars could transform America in dramatic ways for the better.  

Meanwhile, the Iraqi state was put together as a crudely sectarian highly centralized government wracked by incompetence and corruption with billions of oil dollars pilfered.  The Kurds are part of Iraq in name only; they have their own military, and their own oil wells, and other than using Iraqi currency and passports, have cut themselves off from the state.

The chaos of Iraq attracted thousands of Jihadis to Iraq, many coming through Syria.  Suicide bombings were common, and vicious terror groups such as Al-Qaeda in Iraq were formed out of the Sunni Iraqi community that had been secular Baathists in Saddam's days.  Rather than making Iraqi lives better, the US occupation led to all-out civil war, with the death toll in the hundreds of thousands, and with millions of Iraqi refugees, many who ironically fled to Damascus in the prior decade.  

Geopolitically, the new Iraq was a close ally of Iran, and supportive of Assad in Syria.  Iran now had influence extending from its borders all the way to Hezbollah in Lebanon.  

Once the Syrian Civil War heated up around 2012, the flow of Jihadis reversed, with many entering northern Syria, dominated by Sunni Arabs who were closely linked to Sunni Arabs of northern/western Iraq.  As Syria collapsed, and Assad circled the wagons around Damascus and the strip of urban territory running north and then to the coast, eastern Syria became a no-man’s land.  This vacuum was filled by Jihadists based in Iraq, now going by the name of Daesh or ISIS.  They were led by Sunni Arabs from Iraq, many of whom were part of Al-Qaeda in Iraq in prior years.  There is no way that would have occurred if Saddam Hussein was still in Baghdad.  ISIS has now dominated a stretch of territory going from Aleppo in Syria to Mosul in Iraq, and no one has been able to dislodge them.  The Kurds could probably do it, but Turkey is totally against letting that happen.  The Iraqi Army is a corrupted dysfunctional mess with billions of dollars of US equipment going to waste.  The Shia militias will fight, but they tend to massacre Sunnis when they win, or at least do a bit of ethnic cleansing, so the US has pushed Baghdad to keep them on a short leash.

Now we have 10 million Syrian refugees, half of the prewar population.  7 million are internally displaced, another million or so are each in Lebanon, Turkey, and Jordan.  And of those, some tens of thousands are trying to reach Europe and restart their lives in Germany or France or Sweden if possible.  The Syrian refugee issue has no end in sight till the civil war is ended, and with both sides equally matched and profoundly brutal, that is not happening soon.

This catastrophic mess in Iraq and Syria, and the ongoing ISIS propaganda, did more to encourage anti-Western sentiment than anything Bin Laden could have dreamed of.  Thousands of Western Muslims, and perhaps a hundred or more Americans, have been radicalized, and fought in these lands.  What harm may they do in the future?  

Despite this pathetic record, the new GOP line is that everything was going swimmingly until Obama left Iraq.  That is absurd on several levels.  The Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) that called for all US military forces to leave Iraq by December 2011 was negotiated by Bush, not Obama.  Now the claim is that Obama should have tried really hard to get the Iraqis to allow 10,000 American soldiers to hang out in Baghdad.  That would require them having legal immunity, which the Iraqi Parliament was never going to vote for.  In addition, the American people did not want to leave soldiers in Iraq, they wanted them out of the country.  Obama was elected in part on his promise to end the war.  Finally, the whole idea makes no sense on its face.  So what if 10,000 American soldiers were in Iraq confined to a base or a few bases around Baghdad?  That wasn't going to make the phantom Iraqi Army fight back when ISIS grabbed the Sunni areas.  And even though Obama pulled the soldiers out, the American Embassy in Iraq was huge, and there was still a big American presence in Baghdad.  The whole notion rests on the unstated idea that Iraq would not really have an independent government, its policies would continue to be dictated by Washington, and that was not going to happen.  It also suggests that American troops would go into major combat if needed to hold Iraq together, but the US had clearly no interest in further combat roles.  The Iraqi Shia had seized power and they were going to wield it for their benefit, not hand it over in perpetuity to an occupying army.  Whether Obama kept a few battalions locked on a base in Baghdad was not going to change the internal politics and social dynamics of the new Iraq.  A few thousand American soldiers have now been back in Iraq for a year doing training and trying to help reconstitute the Iraqi army.  What dramatic difference has that made?

Vietnam used to be the greatest American foreign policy blunder.  In terms of blood it was costlier with 50,000 dead.  But the effect on America's standing and foreign policy goals turned out to be minimal.  The dominoes never fell in Southeast Asia.  The repercussions never went outside Indochina.  And it turned out the Vietnamese didn't like the Chinese much so it did not constitute some expansion of Chinese Communist power.  Instead they fought a border war with each other a few years after the fall of Saigon.

In contrast, not only was Iraq a short-term disaster in terms of blood and treasure, it has been a long-term debacle of geopolitics in the Middle East.  It has provided a huge boost to Iran's regional standing, while diminishing the US and its allies.  It has created massive refugee problems and contributed to the breakup of Syria.  It has allowed Jihadist groups to form and train where none had existed before.  It besmirched the standing of the US by showing our leaders to be incompetent planners, and instigators of unjustified aggressive war.  It created an ongoing source of radicalization of Western Muslim young males against the US and Western Europe.  It has turned Iraq into a sectarian mess, in which every minority group has reason to fear for their existence.  Ancient Iraqi Christian communities dating from the Roman Empire are emptying out, and the treatment of the small Yazidi sect by ISIS is appalling.  Sunni and Shia, who have coexisted in Muslim lands for centuries, intermarried, and lived together are now part of some grand regional conflagration whose end is not in sight.  There will be even more ethnic cleansing before it is done.

 

PREVIOUSLY

Three States, Three Debates

What's Wrong with the Democrats?

Can Elections Bring Peace to Iraq?

Elections in Iraq

Can Generals Yield to Democrats?

IMF Give Pakistan an “A”

Improve Higher Education in Pakistan

A Framework for Reconciliation

Iraq’s Elections By

Privatizing Power

Bullish in Karachi

Palestinians Should Abandon Suicide Bombings

The F-16’s

Bush’s Social Security Plan

Growth and Investment

Patronage Versus Policy

Aziz, the PML, and 2007

Are We Running out of Oil?

Purchasing Power

Economic Progress

Social Progress

PTCL and the Privatization Roller-coaster

Bombing in Britain

The Ummah is Not a Tribe

Is the US Oppressing the Muslims?

Is Iraq Dissolving?

Sharon Retreats

Pakistan and Israel

The Earthquake

The Other Earthquakes

The Battle for the Supreme Court

Pakistan’s Physician Exports

Beginning of the End in Palestine

Intelligent Design and Other Religious Beliefs

Shifting Populations in South Asia

Sharon’s Stroke

Building Dams

Hamas in Charge

Free Elections in 2007

Muslim Perspectives on Zionism

Iraq Falls Apart

Big Successes in Privatization

Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

Global Warming

Dennis Ross on the Middle East

What Makes an Islamic State?

The Iraq War

Strong Growth, Falling Poverty

Buffett and His Billions

Why Peace Is Elusive in the Middle East

How Poor is Poor?

How Poor is Poor?
Pakistan’s Growth Moment

Declare a Palestinian State

The London Bomb Plot

Who Won the Lebanon War?

Iran, Israel, and the Bomb

The Pope’s Speech

Democrats Win!

The Republicans Lick Their Wounds

Finally, Some Enlightened Moderation

The Error in the War on Terror

Economic Challenges for Pakistan

Reshaping the Middle East - Part 1

Reshaping the Middle East - Part Two

The Surge to Defeat

Whither Palestinians?

Pakistan and Afghanistan

Blind to the Future?

Musharraf Goes Too Far

Letter from Lahore

Can Musharraf Escape His Own Trap?

Will Healthcare Swallow the Economy?

Israel’s Surprise Offer

The Economy Surges Again

Al Gore Should Run

Pakistan’s Arms Industry

Any Exit from Iraq?

Deal, No Deal, or Many Deals

Nawaz Comes and Goes

Will Musharraf Wriggle Through?

Can We Stop Global Warming?

Bush’s Sputtering “War on Terror” Loses Again

Mental Health at Guantanamo Bay

What a Mess!

Will Musharraf’s Errors Prove Fatal?

How About Some Good News?

Anyone but Nawaz

China, India, and Pakistan: Whose Citizens Live Best?

Electing the Next President

Benazir’s Tragedy

Pakistan Election

Democracy and Pakistan

False Hopes in Palestine

Dinner with Shaukat Aziz

How Real Were Aziz’s Reforms?

The State of Pakistan

A Real Debate on Iraq

Stop Negotiating

Severe Challenges Face Pakistan’s Economy

Mindless Obsession with Musharraf

After Musharraf, More Musharraf?

Can Obama Do It?

Pakistan’s Poverty Profile

Economic Crisis in Pakistan

Can Obama Beat McCain?

Was the Aziz Boom a Mirage?

Pakistan’s Presidency

The Failed Presidency of George W. Bush

McCain Is Not Finished

The Economic Meltdown

A Year after the Annapolis Peace Conference

The Significance of Obama’s Win

Pakistan’s Economic Challenge

New Finds in Qur’anic History

The Assault on Gaza

Is a Trillion Dollar Stimulus Really Needed?

Bush’s Economic Legacy

How Big a Problem is Global Warming?

The Collapse of Oil Prices

Barack and the Banks

Pakistan Surrenders to the Taliban

The Collapse of the Republicans

Will Debt Defeat Obama?

Will Debt Defeat Obama?

The Torture Debate

Israel and Iran: Tyrants Cling to Power

Healthcare Reform

Is Israel Held to A Higher Standard?

Pak Economy Needs Growth

How to Really Control Health Care Costs

Do Not Attack Iran

Obama Confronts Failure in Afghanistan

Why Does the Islamic World Under-perform?

Final Chance for Palestine?

What Killed the Pak Economy in 2008?

Should Obama Fight Global Warming?

Obama’s Good Start

The Twisted Logic of the Extremists

Should France Ban the Burqa?

Slow Progress in Pakistan

Palestinians Resume Negotiations

The Farce of Islamic Creationism

Obama’s Secret Plan to Raise Taxes

Democratic Steps in Pakistan

Faisal Shahzad and the Taliban

Can Obama Win in Afghanistan?

The Meaning of Israeli Piracy

Annual Economic Survey of Pakistan

Nostalgia for Musharraf

No Good Choices for Netanyahu

The Attacks on Islam

The Trends in American Politics

Immigration Reshaping US and Europe

Pointless Peace Talks with Netanyahu

Another Episode of Military Rule?

Pakistan ’s Misguided Afghan Strategy

The Middle East in Wikileaks

Brazil Recognizes Palestine

Obama’s Tax Deal

Republicans, Tax Cuts, and Bad Math

Pakistan in Chaos

The Tunisian Revolution

The Arabs and Democracy

The Palestinians and Peace

The Arab Spring Continues

Bin Laden is Dead

Can We Go Back to Normal?

Obama and the 1967 Borders for Palestine

Was Pakistan Helping bin Laden?

Can the American Economy Be Fixed?

Pakistan’s Weak Economy

The Fall of Gadhafi

America Has a Jobs Crisis, Not a Debt Crisis

Ten Years after 9/11

The State of Palestine

The Failure of Pakistan’s Afghan Policy

The Failure of Pakistan’s Afghan Policy

Will Obama Win or Lose in 2012?

The Meaning of ‘Occupy Wall Street’

100,000 Rally for Imran Khan

Don’t Worry, America Is Not Italy

The Failure of Pakistan’s Afghan Policy

Newt Invents Palestine

Operation Iraqi Freedom Ends

Obama's Many Paths to Victory

Islam’s Not So Bloody Borders

Can We Stop Global Warming?

The Supreme Court Worries about Broccoli

The Coming Republican Meltdown

The Endless Republican Depression

The Demise of the Euro

Mending US-Pakistan Relations

Acid Throwers in Pakistan

Bloodbath in Syria

Obama Wins Big on Health Care

Romney, Obama, Virginia and Iowa

1.6 Billion Muslims

A White House Iftar

Transforming Saudi Arabia

A Romney Loss Will Crush the Republicans

The Historical Roots of Modern Jihad

Obama Flops in First Debate

Obama and Romney Go Down to the Wire

The End of the Southern Strategy

Occupation Is the Problem

The Republicans Have a Problem with White People

Obama Halves the Deficit

Has the Arab Spring Failed?

Ten Years Ago Bush Destroyed Iraq and His Presidency

How Much Longer for Assad?

Terror in Boston

The Economy Comes Back

Third Chance for Nawaz Sharif

Third Chance for Nawaz Sharif

Immigration Reform Moves Forward

The Fall of the Muslim Brotherhood

The Receding Threat of Global Warming

Still Seeking a Palestinian State

The Republicans' Desperate Shutdown

Was Thomas Jefferson A Muslim?

Time to Raise the Minimum Wage

I nequality and Islam

Israel and Palestine

How Poor is Pakistan?

The Collapse of Iraq

Bill Maher’s Islamophobia

Obama’s Puzzling Unpopularity

Obama’s Nuclear Weapon

Defeating ISIS

Pakistan Must Return to the Vision of Jinnah

Maher Hathout: A Tribute

I Am Not Charlie

Obama Strikes a Deal with Iran

Assad Barely Hangs On

China Invests in Pakistan

The Future of Islam

Obama Makes a Deal with Iran

Obama Fights Global Warming


Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.