Objectives Resolution Termed Deviation from Quaid-i-Azam’s Vision
By Shazia Hasan
Karachi
“The Objectives Resolution, adopted by the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan on March 12, 1949, was a deviation from the Quaid-i-Azam’s perception of Pakistan,” said Dr Syed Jaffar Ahmed, one of the leading scholars of Pakistan Studies, during his talk at the University of Karachi’s Department of History on Tuesday.
The resolution over the years stirred much debate on its rationale and utility and even after 70 years it is important to reassess this historic document with objectivity, he added.
Pakistan did not have a constitution in 1947 and resultantly the Government of India Act of 1935 served as the interim constitution. Meanwhile, India was quick in making its own constitution after independence which led to pressure on the government from the Pakistani press to do the same.
“It was in February of 1949 that the Constituent Assembly met and the draft of the resolution was presented after which Shabbir Ahmed Usmani sent it to jail to Maulana Maududi there who was doing time for his fatwa on jihad in Kashmir. It was after Maududi had made amendments to the text of the Objectives Resolution that it was passed by the Constituent Assembly,” he said, adding that the resolution had made Pakistan a theocracy.
“This resolution talks about democracy, it talks about federations, it talks about provincial autonomy and it also talks about minorities. Then what is the objection?” the scholar asked before saying that finding that out required careful reading of the constitutional documents.
“You will not find the word ‘republic’ in there,” he said. “It means that the drafters were trying to avoid the sovereignty of the state to the people.” And they drafted that the sovereignty over the state belongs to God.
“So, what then is the role of the parliament?” he asked. “For example, if the parliament is discussing a bill which has been proposed, who will decide the will of God or His intention? Therefore, the parliament was given a devolved authority as for all laws it needs to be seen whether they fulfil the spirit of the Qur’an and Sunnah,” he explained.
“In his famous August 11, 1947 speech, the Quaid-i-Azam named the Constituent Assembly as having sovereignty. But after what later happened Quaid’s philosophy was compromised. The bureaucracy here wanted to take control, too. And then a civil-military nexus emerged taking shelter in the slogan of Islam,” he said.
“In 1956, when the First Constitution was finally made, the Objectives Resolution was made a preamble. In the 1962 and the 1973 Constitutions, too, as the preamble it was put in the beginning of the Constitution. Then in 1985 there was the eighth amendment drafted and enforced by the technocratic-military government of General Zia to change Pakistan’s system of governance to a semi-presidential system while removing martial law. The Eighth Amendment made Islam and Article 2 and then Article 2(A) a part of the Constitution and thus that preamble became an operative part of the Constitution. It was all being done in the name of Islam,” said Dr Jaffar.
The Eighth Amendment also changed things for minorities in Pakistan. “On the surface everything seemed fine but one word, ‘freely’, mentioned in the Quaid’s Aug 11 speech where he had talked about minorities being allowed to freely practice their religion was missing,” he said.
“For 25 years no one noticed. Then in 2010 it was noticed at the time of the 18th Amendment. The word could not have been dropped accidentally because you need an amendment in the Constitution even if you need to put in an extra comma. And here neither the assemblies nor the Senate knew anything about it,” he said.
“It was a clear departure from the neutrality the Quaid wanted in Pakistan. But it was said that when making his speech the Quaid at the time was only saying that to pacify the feelings of the minorities here. Such kind of talk only belittles his speech and what he was trying to say,” he said.
“Now, although Article 2(A) is still there, the word ‘freely’ has been added again through the 18th Amendment,” he concluded. - Dawn
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
