Destruction of Historic Monuments in Bosnia
By Syed Amir PhD
Bethesda, MD

Earlier this year, in July 2004, news was flashed across the continents that the old historic bridge of Mostar in the republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina had been rebuilt, fully restored and reopened. The reconstruction was hailed worldwide as evidence that a new era of ethnic harmony and inter-religious coexistence was being ushered in a land that had only seen strife, destruction and ethnic cleansing during much of the nineties.

As the work progressed, a team of engineers attempted to meticulously duplicate the original bridge in all details. Even the centuries old bricks were salvaged from the rubble and reused. The opening event was accompanied by great fanfare, music and display of fireworks, and the celebration was covered by news media around the world.

The original bridge was blown up in 1993 by Croat artillery as they waged their assault on the Muslim residents of Mostar. The multiethnic State of Yugoslavia had largely unraveled by this time. The restoration was made much of because the Mostar Bridge was no ordinary bridge. Built in 1566, when Bosnia was part of the Ottoman Caliphate, it was viewed as an exquisite specimen of Turkish/Islamic architecture of the late Middle Ages.

The old bridge was designed by the Turkish architect, Mimar Hajruddin, who himself was trained by the legendary sixteenth-century Ottoman engineer, Mimar Sinan, the acclaimed designer and architect of some magnificent mosques and other buildings of Istanbul. The single-span bridge, some 30 meters long, was one of many elegant Ottoman structures that had adorned the Balkan landscape for close to half a millennium. It had been declared by the UNESCO a part of the world heritage. The Bosnian cities of Mostar and Sarajevo in particular used to draw a large number of tourists in the pre-civil war days, attracted by the distinct Islamic architectural style of their buildings and picturesque settings.

Bosnia was captured in 1463 by the armies of Sultan Muhammad II, the conqueror, a decade after the conquest of Constantinople. It remained a province (Vilayet) of the empire for nearly four-and-half centuries. The population of Bosnia at the time of its conquest was largely Christian, the majority Roman Catholic. However, following the Turkish occupation, Bosnians started to accept Islam in large numbers. It is said that the Sufi-Muslim preachers proved most effective in disseminating the message of Islam. They taught a tolerant version of the religion that allowed the local population to retain many of their cultural and traditional ways.

The Ottoman Caliphs and their Governors lavished inordinate attention and resources on making Bosnia a showcase of Islamic Turkish architecture in Europe. They built splendid mosques and libraries, established Islamic schools and seminaries, and opened shelters for poor. The original layout of the cities was pattered on the Turkish or Middle Eastern style, with market places separated from the residential areas. While Bosnia was part of the Caliphate, many Bosnian Muslims rose to play important roles as high state functionaries, serving as both religious and secular leaders. The Turkish rule was decentralized in character, with provinces enjoying a great deal of autonomy. The religious minorities were allowed to freely practicing their own faiths. A reputation for religious tolerance had encouraged, over the centuries, the immigration of Andalusian Jews, mostly those who had been expelled from Spain following the Chr istian takeover in 1492.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, the Ottoman Empire, unable to keep up with the industrial and technological advancements of the European powers and in dire financial state, progressively grew weaker, losing many of its European possessions. Bosnia often served as a safe haven for Muslims forced to flee from former Ottoman territories as they became independent. Even Bosnia retained its Turkish identity for only a short while longer. In 1878, at the Congress of Berlin, Major European powers, Britain, France, Prussia, and imperial Russia, decided to divide among themselves the European possessions of the Turkish Empire, now being designated as the Sick man of Europe. The province of Bosnia-Herzegovina was awarded to the Austro-Hungarian Empire, which formally annexed it in 1908. Subsequently, the territorial ambitions of Serbia and the Austro-Hungarian Em pire and the rise of Serbian nationalism led to the outbreak of World War I, when a Bosnian Serb assassinated the heir to the Austrian throne, Archduke Ferdinand, in 1914, igniting the bloody conflagration.

At the end of the First World War, Bosnia was appropriated by the kingdom of Serbia, and, eventually at the end of Second World War, it along with six other republics became part of the Republic of Yugoslavia, the successor state to Serbia. For several decades, an uneasy calm prevailed. Helped by Marshall Tito’s iron-fisted policy, different ethnic groups, Serbs, Muslims, and Croats, were forced to live in relative peace and harmony. The peace lasted as long as Marshall Tito did. Following his death in 1980, the country started to splinter. Bosnia had a unique demographic distribution. Alone among these republics, its population was diverse, comprising 40 percent Muslims, the largest percentage in any European nation. In the overall population of Yugoslavia, however, Serbs were the predominant ethnic group.

In December 1991, as the country was disintegrating, the Muslim president of Bosnia, Mr. Izetbegovic, declared independence from Yugoslavia. The announcement brought a harsh reaction from the Serbian Government, leading to reprisals against Muslims and ethnic cleansing of Bosnia. An estimated 250,000 people, mostly Muslims, perished at the hands of the Serb armies during 1992 and 1995. The mayhem did not end until 1995 when NATO planes bombed Serb positions, forcing the Serb army to retreat.

The Mostar Bridge was not the only piece of history that fell victim to ethnic hatred and bigotry in the Balkan’s civil war. Many mosques, libraries, museums met the same fate. A concurrent effort was made to erase all traces of the cultural and religious heritages of Bosnian Muslim community. The full dimension of the damage inflicted on the historic sites is being assessed only now. Perhaps, the most grievous damage was inflicted in 1993 on the centuries-old Bosnian National and University Library in Sarajevo. According to news reports, it housed 1.5 million publications, including 155,000 rare books and manuscripts. Built in the style of medieval Moorish structures and located on the riverfront, it was struck by relentless Serbian bombardment. The building along with most of its precious books was lost in the fire. Even the librarian was shot and killed while heroically attempting to rescue a few priceless manuscripts.

Destruction of the library was only one of many incidents in which centers of learning and research came under attack. A few months earlier, Sarajevo’s Oriental Institute had been firebombed by Serbian forces. It had the reputation of having the largest collection of ancient Islamic and Jewish manuscripts and texts, including the vast collection of 7,000 Ottoman documents dating back to the days when Bosnia was part of the Caliphate. The record of Bosnia’s Ottoman history, spread over five hundred years, perished along with these historic documents.

Muslims and Jews have historically lived harmoniously in Bosnia and indeed in Turkey for centuries. When Bosnia’s National Museum with its collection of 200,000 volumes came under Serb fire in summer of 1992, most of its books were miraculously saved by volunteers who risked their lives in doing so. Among the books saved was a 14th century Jewish sacred text, Haggadah, part of the Talmud, and a masterpiece of Andalusian-Islamic art and calligraphy which had been brought to Bosnia by Jews fleeing the Spanish inquisition some five-hundred years ago.

Besides centers of culture and art, many places of worship also came under attack by religious zealots. Sarajevo’s most renowned Gazi Husrev Beg mosques, built in the 16th century by the Turkish architect, Adzem Asir Ali, was severely damaged by shells from Serbian guns. According to rough estimates, one thousand mosques were partially or completely destroyed in the Balkans during the civil war.

Fanaticism, whether religious or national, is rarely one-sided, especially when raw passions are aroused. Some Albanian Muslim, who constitute about 90 percent of the population of Kosovo, another province of former Yugoslavia, have for several years been locked in a bitter fight against Serbia for independence. In April 2004, some Albanian youths started a rampage against the minority Serbian population, destroying a number of orthodox churches, many of them centuries old and representing some of the finest specimens of Byzantine architecture in Europe. Many of these places of worship are been repaired by the cooperation of both Muslims and Christians.

The malady that motivates people to kill and destroy in the name of religion or nationalism is not confined to any specific region of the globe. The recent carnage in the Balkans clearly shows that it afflicts even those nations erstwhile perceived as relatively advanced, and who above all should have learned a lesson from the devastating experiences of the two world wars.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.