The Schiavo Case: Right-to-Life vs Right-to-Die
By Dr. Rizwana Rahim
Chicago, IL

If it were in the Netherlands, Belgium or Switzerland, it would be legal and common -- not news, and if it were in other countries where health care is unevenly accessible or distributed, if available at all, it would be unimaginable.
Even though each country has its own Schiavos, this is our Theresa (‘Terri’) Marie Schindler Schiavo, born on December 3, 1963 near Philadelphia, the first of three children of Robert and Mary Schindler, and wife of Michael since 1984, and after her cardiac arrest on 25 February 1990 and the resulting brain, in different stages of unconsciousness and long considered in a ‘persistent vegetative state’ (PVP), in a Florida hospice. She died shortly after 9 AM (EST) on March 31, 2005, nearly two weeks after the feeding tube was removed from her.
The case has been extensively covered in the media: the bitterness between Terri’s husband (who wanted her feeding tube removed) and her parents (who wanted to keep her alive, no matter); disputes over insurance money after Terri’s condition; the motives for and accusations of cruelty, selfishness and adultery against Michael who has a girlfriend with whom he has had two children; Michael, as her legal custodian, wishing to honor her wish, according to him, to end the life-support after many unsuccessful attempts over the years; the acrimony between Michael and his in-laws; many court rulings and appeals (all the way to the US Supreme Court); involvement of FL State Governor (Jeb Bush), the State and US legislature and the bills passed; and many extremists pro-and-con pro-life groups. All boiling down to the fact that: Terri, without any life-support (including feeding tube), ordered removed over a week ago, finally breathed her last 13 days after the life support system was removed from her.
The fact that Terri was kept ‘alive’ for the last 15 years is a testimony to the will and the technology to perform medical miracles -- the right-to-life resolve making demands of the technological sophistication. In the US, there are thousands (30-40,000 according to some reports) in similar PVP, with hardly any fuss, but Schiavo’s case is now mired in a raging right-to-die debate, more precisely, the-right-to-die ‘in dignity’. The right-to-die in dignity does not necessarily mean euthanasia, mercy killing, assisted suicide, or deliberate ending of life of a person suffering from an incurable disease or a state that’s near impossible (given the medical resources available) to revert to normal life. And, to some, this distinction is not minor or academic.
Why is Schiavo’s medical situation not just a matter of her family and her doctors alone ? Why have the government, the courts, the church/religious establishments, the bio-ethicists, and the public groups gotten so deeply involved, in such an intense emotionally charged manner? No two physicians, members of the same family (including Schiavo’s), same political or cultural group seem to think alike. The public opinion is anguished and torn. The fissures run deep. This is not just in the US, but across the world.
In the US, the thoughts have suddenly turned to personal evaluation of the end-of-life issues, living wills on how one would choose to die. Elsewhere in the world, the opinions run the entire gamut, for instance:
In South Africa, with a crushing number of AIDS victims, it’d be a matter of spreading the limited resources, rather than spending them on one person. In India, the doctors are legally prohibited from denying a life-saving treatment, and all treatment deemed appropriate, but the reality (based on personal resources) may be entirely different. In Russia, euthanasia is illegal, but the reality seems more sympathetic. In Belgium, euthanasia has been legal since 2002. Same is the case in the Netherlands, where physician-assisted suicide is also legal. In these two countries alone, there are on the average 2,500 cases a year. Assisted suicide has not been illegal or a crime in Switzerland for nearly 60 years.
In Britain, there are laws against euthanasia and assisted suicides, but a few have been successfully challenged. And, what is scheduled to be effective later this year includes restrictions, such as “unreasonable persistence” in treating the terminally-ill, and “when medical acts appear useless, disproportionate, or serve no other purpose than the artificial support of life, they can be suspended or not undertaken.” In France, the law specifies that artificial means of sustaining life (like feeding tubes etc.) can legally be withdrawn. In Spain, the doctors would not be permitted to stop the life sustaining measures either. The Spanish law is based on the story of the paralyzed Ramon Sampedro, as told in the Oscar-winning foreign film “The Sea Inside.”
While the Catholic church remains opposed to euthanasia, right-to-die and anything that abridges the life and its sanctity, many countries in Europe overwhelmingly support (about 80% according to some polls) the idea of euthanasia and assisted suicide. Other religions have different opinions, for instance:
The Jewish law and tradition regard human life as sacred, and forbid doing anything that might shorten life. Active euthanasia is regarded as murder, without any exception, and it makes no difference if the terminally ill wants to die. Saving someone from pain is, according to the Jewish tradition, not a reason to kill them; nor is it lawful to kill oneself to save oneself from pain. However it does not require doctors to extend the state of dying.
Muslims are also against euthanasia and suicide: “Do not take life, which Allah made sacred, other than in the course of justice.” (Qur’an 17.33). “If anyone kills a person - unless it be for murder or spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed the whole people.” (Qur’an 5.32); “When their time comes they cannot delay it for a single hour nor can they bring it forward by a single hour.” (Qur’an 16.61); “And no person can ever die except by Allah’s leave and at an appointed term.” (Qur’an 3.145); “Take not life which Allah made sacred otherwise than in the course of justice” (Qur’an 6:151 and 17:33). “Do not kill (or destroy) yourselves, for verily Allah has been to you most Merciful” (Qur’an 4:29). To warn against suicide Prophet Mohammad said,”Whoever kills himself with an iron instrument will be carrying it forever in hell. Whoever takes poison and kills himself will forever keep sipping that poison in hell. Whoever jumps off a mountain and kills himself will forever keep falling down in the depths of hell.”
The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics endorsed by the First International Conference on Islamic Medicine (Islamic Organization of Medical Sciences, Kuwait, 1981, p.65) includes: “Mercy killing, like suicide, finds no support except in the atheistic way of thinking that believes that our life on this earth is followed by void. The claim of killing for painful hopeless illness is also refuted, for there is no human pain that cannot be largely conquered by medication or by suitable neurosurgery...”.
On pain, suffering and endurance, Islam has special consideration: “Those who patiently preserve will truly receive a reward without measure” (Qur’an 39:10). “And bear in patience whatever (ill) maybe fall you: this, behold, is something to set one’s heart upon” (Qur’an 31:17). Prophet Mohammad taught “When the believer is afflicted with pain, even that of a prick of a thorn or more, God forgives his sins, and his wrongdoings are discarded as a tree sheds off its leaves.”
Some on the extreme right have contrasted this with the stem cell battle: Terri is like a 64-cell blastocyst (containing stem cells) but without any potential, and interfering with it (stopping its normal growth) is murder.
Terri has now become a metaphor straddling the struggle between the right-to-life and the right-to-die, a religio-cultural battle. During the Good Friday-Easter weekend (when Jesus was crucified and resurrected) very few other things would have been more appropriate for consideration.
Schiavo is dead but this debate will go on.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.