A Buzzing but Sizzling Pakistan
(As Found in Pre-Monsoon Heat)
By Mohammad Ashraf Chaudhry
Pittsburg. CA

Pakistan is moving fast, no doubt, but this movement is without a method. The heaps of packing-foam, card-boards and plastic bags that drifted in the morning breeze and covered a good portion of Murree Road, were too much for the lonely broom-sweeper whom my wife and I encountered every day in the morning, and who half-heartedly attempted to clean up the mess made by the Electronic & Frigidaire dealers who minted money during the day, and left the trash and the city behind, and lived in Islamabad. The trash and packing-foam hinted clearly that they did booming business here. According to my authentic estimate each one of them who owned a shop in the Gul-Nur Market pocketed every night close to 2-5 lac rupees. This trash- scenario is neither an isolated happening, nor an unintentional lapse. It is symptomatic of a larger malaise, of a bigger divide.
Never had I yearned so keenly in my life for power, even for a very brief period, than this time. I needed it to use it to its last limits to inflict the heaviest fines on such businessmen as they so blatantly and defiantly defaulted in the basic conduct of how to do business. This attitude has also been reflective of the schism between the rich and the poor, and a clear manifestation of the poor governance which I painfully found more pronounced this time. It was sad to note that the general rule in Pakistan has been to keep those places clean where the big Boss and his associates are to pass by. Common people have learnt to live near dumps like rats, and they are hardly ever mindful of their predicament.
Hiding poverty or alleviating it?
The entire focus of the government machinery appears to be to hide poverty or to deny its existence rather than to confront it boldly and alleviate it. The government’s claim that the percentage of the population living below the poverty line has fallen from 34.46% in 2000-01 to 23.9% in 2004-05 would sound like a crude joke if you personally interact with people and live for a few days with them. I did that by living and moving with them for over three weeks.
Invariably I asked one question to a wide and varied segment of people coming from all walks of life: “If ten people gave you two hundred rupees each, how much money would you have in all?” Nikku, my old fruit vendor, replied, “ Sir Ji, not enough to pay the school fees of my three kids”. Ferozdin, the washman, retorted, “By adding five hundred more I think I should be able to pay this month’s electric bill”. Victor, my barber, came up with a very interesting answer, “I can get my three pairs of scissors sharpened”. A high-school student replied, “ This is not enough even to buy a cheap brand of cellular phone”. “ With 640 rupees per head, hardly three people can dine at the Village or the Islamabad Club”, was the answer of those who had taken my wife and me to these places for dinner. Nobody gave me a direct answer. Each one saw the two-thousand rupees in the light of their urgent and pressing needs.
The pre-monsoon heat stripped people and the government of their false garbs and silly claims. The linen-suited government functionaries and the almost naked common people yearning desperately for a drop of clean water and a few tea spoons of sugar for their children clearly smack of the disconnection between t people and those who rule them. Things may be moving, but not in the right direction. The government revised the petrol prices 45 times and the diesel prices 42 times in one year. According to Dawn of May 18, 2006, the quality of water in the twin cities of Pakistan, namely, Islamabad and Rawalpindi, as per the report prepared by the Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR), is such that it is not drinkable at all. Samples collected from 26 locations in Islamabad confirmed that only at one location the water was drinkable. The analytical data confirmed that 65% of water was contaminated with Coli form bacterium; 23% with E-coli, while 73% samples had excess of Ca etc. In Rawalpindi, out of 15 locations, only two tube-wells were found pumping water that could be termed as safe for drinking. The government acknowledges the problem of shortage of water, but offers the use of mineral bottle water as a solution. The fixing of old leaking water pipes, and better extraction of underground water could have improved the situation. Things this time were worse than they were two years ago when I visited Pakistan.
A comparison with India is unavoidable. India takes pride in five things these days, and is never tired of mentioning them: its huge potential market of 1.1 billion people; its wealth of English-speakers; its façade of being the biggest democracy in the world; its 15-year record of social and economic reforms, and its able and honest top-leadership. The question, according to the Economist of June 3rd, 2006, being asked today in the world with regard to India is no longer whether India can fly, “but how high - and whether the success of its business class can be spread throughout the country”.
India, like Pakistan, has its bottlenecks, too. It is still chained by the world’s most bureaucratic bureaucracy; it has as lousy and dilapidated infrastructure as Pakistan has; and its 38% poverty-stricken population is still an ugly blemish on its claim that soon it may “partner up with the world’s richest democracy - America”. India dreams of attaining the same level of trust and partnership with America which Britain and Israel have. And as my Indian dentist from Punjab firmly told me before I left for Pakistan, “Mr. Chaudhry, you watch, in ten to fifteen years, India will be as good, if not better, as America”.
In Pakistan, I found no reflection of such feelings. Often people sympathized with me for coming to Pakistan in May. A majority urged me to move to Islamabad and make my visits to Rawalpindi as few as possible as if the place where a majority of people live has been infested with plague; very few said a positive word about the boom and buzz that is taking place in Pakistan; a great majority of people spoke unfavorably against President Musharraf and the façade of the democratic government Pakistan is having these days, and to whom they term as a club of the corrupt and the opportunists; religious fanaticism has not been on the decline; in fact, I found new cults emerging in one form or another. 100% people grumbled about corruption; about bad governance; inflation and high prices. A stoical disinterestedness appears to have settled in the general public as if they are the ones who have been abandoned and forsaken by those who have chosen to rule over them.
The opposition is singularly united on one issue: how to dislodge the government and remove President Musharraf. What happens after him, or who will replace him, hardly matters to them. Their search for issues that can be used to oust President Musharraf has reached a ludicrous level. In four weeks of stay in Pakistan, I witnessed amusedly the creation of two such issues. The death of Amar Cheema, a student in Germany in police custody, was picked up and turned into a big issue, and finally lead to the demand that Pakistan should sever relations with Germany and Amar Cheema be declared a national hero. One columnist wrote, “One of Amar’s teachers dreamt that he found himself in a very sacred and big gathering of pious people. On inquiry he found that they were all Sahaba. He also felt that the Holy Prophet was also nearby. Then he heard the holy voice of the Prophet saying, “Hasan, Hussain, where are you? Look, who is coming. Take Amar with you”. The imams repeated this dream in their Friday prayer Khutbas. By the time I left Pakistan, the Amar shaheed issue had subsided.
Then came the 28th of May, the day Pakistan went nuclear in 1998. The opposition celebrated it as The Takbeer Day. Since the government remained on a low key, because clearly the country “did not get the kind of national security into eternity as it had claimed; nor did it feel to reduce the need for conventional weapons, slashing the defense budget and using the funds thus saved for education and development. In fact, in the words of Pervez Hoodbhoy, a nuclear scientist, “Pakistan’s nuclear acquisition of nuclear weapons has made it effectively a less independent state…Pakistan is clearly now the most watched and monitored country… the bombs did not unify the country”. The indiscreet opposition found a good material in this whole issue to project the image of their respective leaders; People’s party claiming Zulfiqar as the pioneer and father of the nuclear program and PML (N) claiming the event as the boldest feat of their very bold leader, Mian Nawaz Sharif. While the government remained embarrassed on these two issues, Pakistan as a country suffered substantially image-wise.
The cat-and-mouse tussle between the government and the opposition is clearly telling upon the economic potential of the country. While India has taken off and is assessing how high it can fly; Pakistan due to internal and external factors, is in danger of sliding off-track or even tripping at the very take-off stage. The government could have done much more in the social, political and economic sectors, but it soon became complacent. And now, it appears to be just marking time. If it re-elects President Musharraf, as is hinted by Mushahid before the next elections of 2007, it would definitely hurl the country into a chaotic situation. The crutches of uniform should not be used any longer to prolong ones right to rule. President Musharraf, in all earnestness, appears to have outlived his best. Seven year is a long period to deliver; the rest that follows is a mere repetition
The opposition is vindictive, short-sighted and vision-less. President Musharraf, as I discovered during this visit, has been wasteful of the opportunities that came his way. As a soldier, learning from the bad examples of General Ayub and General Zia, he could have revolutionized the society by starting programs that pertained directly to the well-being and welfare of the common people on a war-footing. He delayed reforms in the education and health sectors; deferred the arrival of true democracy in the country by aligning himself with people who never had the true trust of people; he admits that corruption is the biggest curse in the country, but has allowed the known corrupt to sit with him. Worst of all, and the most painful had been the division of society into the elite and the very poor; one living in the walled cities, and the other on dumps and slums. To me what I witnessed on the Murree Road happening day after day, and no one appearing from anywhere, gave a good peep into how the government is functioning; how the economy is delivering for some; and how the general public is getting affected by its residue.
In the next article, I will share the views of President Musharraf’s spokesman, Maj. General Shaukat Sultan, and the rosy picture he painted on behalf of his boss, and the new Milaad cult in Pakistan.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.