February
10 , 2006
Cultural
Weaknesses
A little while back
I had an interesting conversation with
Lord Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir
Ali who nearly became the Archbishop
of Canterbury, England’s premier
religious position.
The cerebral Michael Nazir Ali, who
originally hailed from Pakistan, told
me that the central weakness in Pakistani
culture is the pursuit of paisa. In
contrast, he said that Europe’s
principal cultural weakness is its preoccupation
with sex. Michael Nazir Ali has a point.
Indeed, greed for grabbing gobs of money
quickly through shortcuts and over-clever
schemes has been the downfall of many
powerful persons in Pakistan. It is
the money-driven culture which, in effect,
converts many elections into auctions
and makes the ‘dikhava’
of democracy merely a tool for the rich
to rule.
Visitors to Europe often are stunned
to see commuters on subways and trains
openly perusing porn magazines and by
the predominance at “news”
kiosks of sexually explicit tabloids,
magazines, books and videos. This saturation
in erotica is further reinforced by
the Internet through which many males
are hooked and addicted to porn.
Looking at India, one sees that India’s
bane has been its Brahmin culture. Mirza
Nasiruddin Masud, formerly private secretary
to Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and UNESCO
Mission Chief to Indonesia, and married
to Atiya Begum, the great-great-granddaughter
of Sir Syed, wrote a book on India entitled
“Caste or Democracy”. Mirza
Masud starkly framed the choice facing
India – either persist with the
caste culture or opt for genuine democracy.
Former Indian Prime Minister I. K. Gujral
wrote the foreword to the book and endorsed
its main point.
Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, framer of
India’s constitution, was an untouchable
Hindu from Dalit community. Dr. Ambedkar,
exclaiming that “untouchability
is another appellation for slavery”
and that “what is tragedy for
the Untouchables is the crime of the
Hindus”, ultimately was so disgusted
by his mistreatment that he converted
to Buddhism before his death.
The June 2003 issue of the prestigious
American magazine, “National Geographic”,
vividly depicted the horrors that the
160-million strong untouchable community
undergoes at the hands of upper-caste
Hindus. CNN’s Chief International
Correspondent, Christiane Amanpour,
did a special documentary in 1999 on
the plight of the Dalit for CBS News’
award-winning TV program “60 Minutes”,
capturing on film the extent of the
inhumane degradation which India’s
Dalit community suffer in the world’s
largest so-called democracy.
America’s Achilles’ heel
is its Israel connection. The great
guru of US foreign policy, George Ball,
wrote a book in 1992 called “The
Passionate Attachment: America’s
Involvement with Israel.” The
book’s title was derived from
the 1796 farewell address of America’s
first president, Gen. George Washington,
who warned that, in shaping its international
relations, America should avoid forming
any ‘passionate attachment’
to or ‘inveterate hatred’
of any other nation.
In the US, the entire issue of Israel
is permeated with hypocrisy, throttling
genuine discussion and debate and distorting
realities. However, when it mattered,
the Jews during the Nazi period were
allowed to sink. For example, President
Franklin D. Roosevelt in May 1939 refused
to let the ship “St. Louis”
– crammed with Jewish refugees
fleeing Nazi Germany – dock in
Miami. The ship returned to Europe and
many of its passengers were incinerated
by Hitler’s Germany. Only in the
post-war era, as the American Jewish
community gradually gained influence
and power, did the tables turn and American
politicians and right-wing Christians
change gears and become apologists for
Zionism.
All of the above indicates that if weaknesses
within are not corrected or curbed they
cause considerable damage.