March
10 , 2006
Global
Storm
The cartoon row lit
a spark that now has gathered into a
global storm in spots as far apart as
Nigeria, Turkey and Indonesia. Editors
and cartoonists of Europe who supposedly
wanted to teach European Muslims a ‘lesson
in democracy and free expression’
may be learning some lessons of their
own. They miscalculated. That miscalculation
was borne out of sheer arrogance and
spite.
There are some salient issues which
need to be addressed.
First, who was the aggressor and initiator
of this? By his own admission, this
was willfully done by a Danish newspaper
editor with an intent to enrage and
outrage the Muslims and supposedly to
put them in their place.
Second, was there an opportunity to
defuse? Yes. Denmark’s Prime Minister
had ample opportunities for damage control
had he not declined to meet Muslim envoys
and had he clearly and unambiguously
disavowed and denounced the unprovoked
publication of the offending cartoons.
Third, who escalated it? The newspaper
editors in France, Italy, Holland, Germany,
Spain and Switzerland unforgivably and
irresponsibly escalated the crisis by
coordinating the simultaneous reprinting
of the offending cartoons on February
1. It was a taunt to European Muslims
as well as throwing a gauntlet at them
with the clear message: this is the
respect we have for you and your faith,
and you Muslims can do nothing about
it.
Fourth, what has been the role of the
Muslim governing establishment in this
crisis? Instead of seizing the initiative,
taking ownership and charge of the matter
and projecting the massive sense of
Muslim outrage across the world, they
dawdled, delayed, allowed the situation
to drift and, in the process, lost leadership
over the crisis.
For its part, the OIC and its chief
failed to move quickly and decisively
to take actions to defuse and redress
the deep sense of moral indignation
aroused by the event. This issue is
too big to be swept under the carpet.
And there is no room to hide.
This is not what the late King Faisal
had envisaged when the OIC was set up
in 1969 in the aftermath of the attempt
to set ablaze the Al-Aqsa mosque in
Jerusalem. It was Faisal, too, who showed
the way by convening the Islamic Summit
in Lahore in the wake of the October
1973 Ramadan war during which Faisal
perceived excessive Western support
for Israel.
Finally, what lies ahead now?
The quicker the non-Muslim world realizes
the seriousness of the issue and how
deeply offensive this is for the Muslims
worldwide, the less the chances of it
spiraling out of control. On this point,
it would be a folly to artificially
divide the Muslims into moderates (who
will remain mute) and radicals (who
will kick up a storm). On this galvanic
issue, there will be very few moderates.
European media has been remarkably successful
in undermining the forces of dialogue,
reconciliation and interfaith harmony.
If European editors are capable of simultaneously
reprinting cartoons, then surely the
leaders of the offending European nations
are fully capable of jointly expressing
their contrition.
There is an outside chance that the
cartoon episode may trigger a strategic
reassessment within the Muslim world
on the blunders of pursuing its existing
priorities of paisa, perks and privileges.
This pursuit has inadvertently kept
the Muslims powerless by leaving an
empty space in the policy arenas that
truly matter.
It can be rectified, however, by building
an enduring presence in arenas which
shape ideas, develop views, and influence
the framing of issues – leading
to genuine empowerment. If that occurs,
the battle of ideas will be well contested
and foes will think twice before taking
liberties with core Muslim beliefs.