By Dr. Nayyer Ali

June 02 , 2006

What Makes an Islamic State?

What is an Islamic state? What makes a state “Islamic”? How should Muslims answer this complex question in the modern context? I will put forth my views on this issue, but first I will delve into the historical context of where we find ourselves, and why this issue is currently so important.
In 1789 the French Revolution began, as did the Presidency of George Washington. In hindsight, one can see that the birth of the modern world was occurring. From 1800 to 2100, we are in the midst of the modernization of Eurasia and its offspring, which includes North America. This three-hundred year process involves two distinct phases. The first was the modernization of the European civilization, which lasted from 1800 into the end of the 20th century. The second phase began rather slowly after World War II and de-colonization, but is now switching into high gear, namely the modernization of Asia and the Middle East. This will take another 100 years to fully play out.
European modernization was associated with enormous stresses and conflicts: political conflicts, class conflicts, social conflicts, religious conflicts, and economic and resource conflicts. These struggles led to the rise of three great historical political trends that were the consequence of European modernization. These trends being imperialism, right wing extremism that manifested as fascist ethnic nationalism, and left-wing extremism that gave birth to communism. The death toll of these trends literally ran over 200 million people. It is to the credit of the United States that although not always consistently, it did take the leading role in defeating and undoing all three of these manifestations of Europe’s modernization. It was the defining central task of American foreign policy in the 20th century, even up to the Dayton Accords and the Kosovo War.
We are now faced with the second phase of Eurasia’s modernization, that of Asia and the Middle East. This too is a complex challenge. The challenge, in fact, comprises three distinct challenges. This region of the world is dominated by three groups: China, India, and the Muslim-majority countries. Peacefully integrating the rise of China and India into the international commercial and political system represents obvious American priorities. But the third group, the Muslims also should be seen as an American priority. In total population, geographic extent, and economic significance, the Muslim world equals or exceeds the significance of India or China. In population terms it is not only larger, but faster growing, and it is highly probable that a plurality of the world’s children are Muslims.
There are some obvious differences between the Muslims and China and India. China and India are both unified single nation-states, with populations over 1 billion each, while there are over 50 Muslim countries, and only three have populations of over 100 million. Both China and India are accepted nuclear powers, while only Pakistan has a grudgingly tolerated nuclear capability among the Muslim countries. Finally, neither China nor India appears to offer an ideological challenge to the US at par with European challenges of the last century. But the Muslim world may be offering an ideological challenge.
The ideological challenge is in fact quite broad, and is rooted in a conservative, but modern, interpretation of Islam. Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda are just an extreme manifestation of this ideology, and are not its core. Other manifestations include Wahhabism, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Iranian clerical state, the FIS in Algeria, the Taliban, and the religious parties in Pakistan and Southeast Asia. The movement has both strong local and trans-national characteristics. It is being fueled by two sources. The first is internal, as a reaction to modernization, and the second is external, related to the weakness of the Muslims in international affairs.
The internal forces that are tearing at societies throughout the Muslim world are the forces of modernization. These are the obvious things like urbanization, mass literacy and higher education, industrialization, women’s empowerment, and the creation of very powerful centralized governments. These changes are forcing Islam to adapt. Traditional Islam was well-suited to pre-modern rural illiterate societies. But with tremendous social change, the practice of Islam is also changing. In country after country there is a full-throated conflict between new interpretations of Islam, some liberal and some conservative or reactionary. Both Khomeinism and Wahhabism are modern views of Islam, and do not represent traditional Islam. There is no precedence in Muslim history for the religious Ulema to have supreme political power; this is a startling innovation of Khomeini. Likewise, there is no historical Muslim precedent for the religious police system that is used in Saudi Arabia, and was copied by the Taliban. What then is the correct interpretation? What does Islam really say about gender equality, free speech, democracy, minority rights, and a whole host of modern issues?
Let me illustrate the situation by looking at the status of women in Pakistan. Can we say Pakistan is a liberal or conservative society at present? For women in rural Pakistan life can be very oppressive. There is still significant resistance to education in some areas, there is honor killing, there is widespread domestic violence, and women furnish much worse health and education statistics than men. The legal code in Pakistan states that a woman bringing an accusation of rape must be simultaneously humiliated with a charge of adultery until the court can resolve the claims. But on the flip side, Pakistan was the first Muslim country, in 1988, to elect a woman as Prime Minister. One in six seats in the Parliament are reserved for women. The current governor of the central bank and the ambassador to Britain are both women. The Air Force just graduated its first class of women fighter pilots, and the majority of doctors in Pakistan are female. And the government allowed the first mixed-gender public marathon last September and deployed a heavy police and army presence to protect the runners. So should we say Pakistan’s women are liberated or are they shackled?
This struggle between liberals and conservatives must be won on the grounds of Islamic interpretation. The notion that Muslim societies, as they modernize, will follow the European path of secularism does not appear to be happening. Instead, for a liberal view of how Muslim states should be organized to take hold, it must be rooted in an authentic Islamic foundation that is accepted by the public. We must go to the sources of Islam, particularly to the Qur’an and the life of the Prophet, and also to the juristic tradition, and forge strong arguments on these questions.
It is incorrect to assume that Islam does not separate religion and politics. After the Prophet, there was always separation between the temporal rulers, who were usually dynastic monarchies, and the religious thinkers and jurists. What was Islamic about the system is that the law was sourced in jurisprudence that was developed over time, in a manner similar to English common law, but on the basis of Islamic religious principles and precedents. This gave the legal schools of thought that evolved a sense of being “God’s law”.
This same framework can still be utilized by Muslim societies. The ultimate expression of a polity’s values is in its constitution. And it is in the constitution that an Islamic state is created by a Muslim society. They should write a constitution, through a democratic process, that expresses fundamental Islamic values that will shape the state. They should then develop democratic institutions that function under that constitution to write laws, interpret them, and enforce them. There is no need for a privileged group of Muslims to do that. The system is Islamic because the constitution is consistent with how the polity interprets Islam. Therefore there is no need for a group of “experts” to decide whether individual laws are consistent with Islam, they just need to be constitutionally permitted. As society’s interpretation of Islam changes, it can amend the constitution to reflect that. Liberals and conservatives can argue for their specific interpretations of what are core Islamic values to be enshrined in the constitution.
I would do exactly that. I would make the argument for why free speech, democracy, basic principles of justice, freedom of religion, gender equality, economic freedom, and a whole host of other human rights are core Islamic values that should be in the constitution. A state with such a constitution is an Islamic state, regardless of the particular religious beliefs of its officers.
There is in fact strong historical precedence for a written constitution that enshrines the state’s powers and obligation. When the Prophet came to Medina at the invitation of its residents, who were involved in prolonged civil conflict, he drew up a constitution, known historically as the Compact of Medina, which bound the polity of Muslims, Jews, and pagans, together on an equal basis. The Compact gave the Prophet temporal leadership and judicial power, but did not recognize him as having religious authority over anyone.
The entire Ummah is in turmoil precisely over these issues. What does Islam say? Who has authority to rule, and how is that authority limited? What is the role of democracy? How Muslims answer these questions will have a decisive impact on the history of this century.


PREVIOUSLY

Deflating Japan

Bush’s Axis of Evil

Speaking to Non-Muslims

If Arafat Were Jinnah

The Shape of Things to Come

South Asia Expert Calls for Negotiations on Kashmir

Kashmir After the Cold War

Kashmir Quagmire: How It Started

Kashmir: Where We’ve Been

Make Way for the Euro

Will there Be a Muslim Palestine?

Careful, Careful

Our Growing Community

Pakistan’s Golden Opportunity

Musharraf’s Reform Plans

Pakistan’s Afghan Dilemma

Humanity on the Move

Strategies of America, Pakistan and Benazir

Winners and Losers

America’s Strategy Defang the Fundamentalists

The Noose Tightens

Pakistan in America

Musharraf’s Moment

A Sad Day for America, A Sad Day for Islam

Repeal the Blasphemy Law

Bush’s Stem Cell Compromise

The Depressing Stock Market

An Evening on Human Development

“Benazir” Takes Over in Indonesia

Race Riots in Britain

Global Warming or Just Hot Air?

Milosevic on Trial

Russia’s Collapse

Economic Recovery in Pakistan?

President Khatami’s Re-election

Lifting Sanctions on Pakistan

Israel’s Moral Burden

A Break in the Logjam?

The Second American Century

Pakistan’s Constitution

Dr. Lodhi in Los Angeles

Literacy: The Road Forward

Why Yusuf Can't Read

Literacy: The Glass is Half Full

Blowing Up Buddha

A Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Pakistan

Did You See the Moon?

Cornrows, Ali Khan, and Culture

Will the Children Go To Harvard?

Muslim Political Progress

Information Technology Gets A Boost

Sand and Oil

On Lieberman

Pakistan Builds A Tank

Kashmir in the Nuclear Age

Full Speed Ahead on Privatization

A Muslim France?

Too Much Food

Watching the Election Why Are We Hollywood’s Villains?

A Tyrant Falls

Taliban Victorious

The Walking Whale of Pakistan
The Joy of Air Travel?

The Amazing American Economy
Arafat and Jerusalem

Names For The Children

Population: Too Many or Too Few?

It Does Matter

Aziz Goes For Growth

The Military Government's First Budget

L'Affaire Salam

End Sanctions on Iraq

Third World Democracy

Light Weapons Trade on the Rise

Iran Reforms

Back to the Future

The Saudis and OPEC Mature

How Can We Help Pakistan Develop?

Report Card on Musharraf

IMF Vs Pakistan

A Candid Discussion on Foreign Policy Issues

A Sad Tale of Missed Opportunities

Cold War In Kashmir

Whither Afghanistan?

National Security and Literacy

Pakistan Votes

The People Win

What is an Islamist?

Selling the Crown Jewels

Still Not Government

One Year After the Taliban

Benazir's Folly

Iraq and Oil

Saddam and Iraq - I

Saddam and Iraq - 2

Muslim Democracy

Zakat and Capitalism

Zakat and Capitalism - 2

The Economy Picks Up

The American Military: Power without Limit?

Good Foreign Policy is Good Anti-Terrorism Policy

The Arrest of Khalid Shaikh Mohammad

Bush Takes a Gamble

Bush Attacks

Besieging Baghdad

Darkness in Saddam's Bunker

Piccadilly It Aint Qissa Khani Is Still Qissa Kahani

Ed Asner and Afghanistan's Progress

Bush Delivers a Roadmap

Liberation or Imperialism

The Roadmap

Economic Rebound

Musharraf in Los Angeles

Economic Growth will lead to Democracy

Trapped by Myths and Fantasies

The Surge in Karachi Stocks

Bush's Busted Budget

America's Broken Healthcare

Time to Buy Stocks?

Islam, the State, and Human Rights

30 Years after the Oil Shock

The Future of Oil Wealth

Pakistan, India and Human Development

Pakistan's Eid Present

Iraq, Democracy and Islam

The End of Saddam Hussein

Three Wins for Pakistan

The Islamabad Declaration

Kerry's Big Wins

Repeal Hudood and Blasphemy

Bush's Growing Vulnerability

What Has Aziz Done?

Bits and Pieces

The Growth of India

Chaos in Iraq

Bush Caves in to Sharon

Abuse at Abu Ghraib

Too Harsh, Musharraf

The BJP Loses

What Do the Jihadis Want?

The Pak Economy: Bigger than We Think

Is America Richer than Europe?

Prime Minister Aziz

Unbundling WAPDA

Musharraf's Uniform

Chess Game in Kashmir

Three States, Three Debates

What's Wrong with the Democrats?

Can Elections Bring Peace to Iraq?

Elections in Iraq

Can Generals Yield to Democrats?

IMF Give Pakistan an “A”

Improve Higher Education in Pakistan

A Framework for Reconciliation

Iraq’s Elections By

Privatizing Power

Bullish in Karachi

Palestinians Should Abandon Suicide Bombings

The F-16’s

Bush’s Social Security Plan

Growth and Investment

Patronage Versus Policy

Aziz, the PML, and 2007

Are We Running out of Oil?

Purchasing Power

Economic Progress

Social Progress

PTCL and the Privatization Roller-coaster

Bombing in Britain

The Ummah is Not a Tribe

Is the US Oppressing the Muslims?

Is Iraq Dissolving?

Sharon Retreats

Pakistan and Israel

The Earthquake

The Other Earthquakes

The Battle for the Supreme Court

Pakistan’s Physician Exports

Beginning of the End in Palestine

Intelligent Design and Other Religious Beliefs

Shifting Populations in South Asia

Sharon’s Stroke

Building Dams

Hamas in Charge

Free Elections in 2007

Muslim Perspectives on Zionism

Iraq Falls Apart

Big Successes in Privatization

Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

Global Warming

Dennis Ross on the Middle East

Editor: Akhtar M. Faruqui
© 2004 pakistanlink.com . All Rights Reserved.